SynthesisPloS one2017
Diagnostic accuracy of ELISA for detecting serum Midkine in cancer patients.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Metabolic reprogramming of arachidonic acid in clear cell renal carcinoma promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment by activating MDK signaling pathway.Clinical and experimental medicine · 2025Article
- Midkine Promotes Tumor Growth and Attenuates the Effect of Cisplatin in Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer medicine · 2025Article
- Autocrine and paracrine effects of MDK promote lymph node metastasis of cervical squamous cell carcinoma.iScience · 2024Article
- Large-scale proximity extension assay reveals CSF midkine and DOPA decarboxylase as supportive diagnostic biomarkers for Parkinson's disease.Translational neurodegeneration · 2023Article
- Midkine (MDK) growth factor: a key player in cancer progression and a promising therapeutic target.Oncogene · 2020Review
- Diagnostic impact of high serum midkine level in patients with gastric cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019Article
- Systematic analysis of gene expression alterations and clinical outcomes of STAT3 in cancer.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Quantum Dot Based Nano-Biosensors for Detection of Circulating Cell Free miRNAs in Lung Carcinogenesis: From Biology to Clinical Translation.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Midkine (MK) has been reported as the potential novel diagnostic biomarker for cancer in several studies, but their results were controversial. Therefore, we performed a diagnostic meta-analysis to assess the diagnostic value of serum MK in cancer patients. A systematic electronic and manual search was performed for relevant literatures through several databases up to June 1, 2017. The quality of the studies included in the meta-analysis was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. All analyses were conducted using stata12.0 software. Ten studies collectively included 1119 cancer patients and 1441 controls met the eligible criteria. The summary estimates were: sensitivity 0.78 (95% CI = 0.68-0.85), specificity 0.83 (95% CI = 0.72-0.90), positive likelihood ratio 4,54 (95% CI = 2.64-7.80), negative likelihood 0.27 (95% CI = 0.18-0.40), diagnostic odds ratio 16.79 (95% CI = 7.17-39.33), and area under the curve 0.87 (95% CI = 0.84-0.89). Publication bias was suggested by Deeks' funnel plot asymmetry test (P = 0.92). According to our results, serum MK has greater diagnostic value in diagnosing cancer, however, more reliable studies in larger cohort should be conducted to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of serum MK.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.