Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28686435›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental science & technology2017

Animal Feces Contribute to Domestic Fecal Contamination: Evidence from E. coli Measured in Water, Hands, Food, Flies, and Soil in Bangladesh.

Ayse Ercumen, Amy J Pickering, Laura H Kwong, Benjamin F Arnold, Sarker Masud Parvez, Mahfuja Alam, Debashis Sen, Sharmin Islam, Craig Kullmann, Claire Chase and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental science & technology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 139 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
139citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

139 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 249 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Antimicrobial-resistantmedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

79 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Ayse ErcumenSchool of Public Health, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6002-1514
Amy J PickeringCivil and Environmental Engineering, Tufts University , Medford, Massachusetts 02153, United States.
Laura H KwongCivil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
Benjamin F ArnoldSchool of Public Health, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
Sarker Masud ParvezInfectious Disease Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh , Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Mahfuja AlamInfectious Disease Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh , Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Debashis SenInfectious Disease Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh , Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Sharmin IslamInfectious Disease Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh , Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Craig KullmannWater Global Practice, World Bank , Washington, D.C. 20433, United States.
Claire ChaseWater Global Practice, World Bank , Washington, D.C. 20433, United States.
Rokeya AhmedWater Global Practice, World Bank , Dhaka, 1207, Bangladesh.
Leanne UnicombInfectious Disease Division, International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh , Dhaka, 1212, Bangladesh.
Stephen P LubyInfectious Diseases & Geographic Medicine, Stanford University , Stanford, California 94305, United States.
John M ColfordSchool of Public Health, University of California , Berkeley, California 94720, United States.
International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research · BDUniversity of California, Berkeley · USStanford University · USWorld Bank · USBangladesh Bank · BDTufts University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fecal-oral pathogens are transmitted through complex, environmentally mediated pathways. Sanitation interventions that isolate human feces from the environment may reduce transmission but have shown limited impact on environmental contamination. We conducted a study in rural Bangladesh to (1) quantify domestic fecal contamination in settings with high on-site sanitation coverage; (2) determine how domestic animals affect fecal contamination; and (3) assess how each environmental pathway affects others. We collected water, hand rinse, food, soil, and fly samples from 608 households. We analyzed samples with IDEXX Quantitray for the most probable number (MPN) of E. coli. We detected E. coli in source water (25%), stored water (77%), child hands (43%), food (58%), flies (50%), ponds (97%), and soil (95%). Soil had >120 000 mean MPN E. coli per gram. In compounds with vs without animals, E. coli was higher by 0.54 log

Indexed as

DipteraEscherichia coliFecesFood ContaminationSanitationAnimalsBangladeshHumansSoilWaterSoilWater

Identifiers

PMID28686435
PMCPMC5541329
OpenAlexW2729964501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.