Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685932›Full record

ArticleProtein science : a publication of the Protein Society2017

Usage of a dataset of NMR resolved protein structures to test aggregation versus solubility prediction algorithms.

Daniel B Roche, Etienne Villain, Andrey V Kajava

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Identification of New FG-Repeat Nucleoporins with Amyloid Properties.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Solubility of proteins.ADMET & DMPK · 2020
    Article
  8. Design of a New [Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2019
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daniel B RocheCentre de Recherche en Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR 5237, Montpellier, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-1840
Etienne VillainCentre de Recherche en Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR 5237, Montpellier, France.
Andrey V KajavaCentre de Recherche en Biologie cellulaire de Montpellier, CNRS-UMR 5237, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There has been an increased interest in computational methods for amyloid and (or) aggregate prediction, due to the prevalence of these aggregates in numerous diseases and their recently discovered functional importance. To evaluate these methods, several datasets have been compiled. Typically, aggregation-prone regions of proteins, which form aggregates or amyloids in vivo, are more than 15 residues long and intrinsically disordered. However, the number of such experimentally established amyloid forming and non-forming sequences are limited, not exceeding one hundred entries in existing databases. In this work, we parsed all available NMR-resolved protein structures from the PDB and assembled a new, sevenfold larger, dataset of unfolded sequences, soluble at high concentrations. We proposed to use these sequences as a negative set for evaluating methods for predicting aggregation in vivo. We also present the results of benchmarking cutting edge tools for the prediction of aggregation versus solubility propensity.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinAmyloidModels, StatisticalNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularSolubilityAmyloid3D structureaggregationamyloid fibrilscomputational approachesdatabaseNMRsoluble

Identifiers

PMID28685932
PMCPMC5563137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.