Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685762›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Drug discovery2017

Opportunities and challenges in phenotypic drug discovery: an industry perspective.

John G Moffat, Fabien Vincent, Jonathan A Lee, Jörg Eder, Marco Prunotto

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Drug discovery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 410 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
410citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

410 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Drug-likeness prioritised selection identifies anti-Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Technology profiles in FDA-approved new molecular entities, 2013-2024: a latent class analysis.Daru : journal of Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

350 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John G MoffatBiochemical &Cellular Pharmacology, Genentech, South San Francisco, California 94080, USA.
Fabien VincentDiscovery Sciences, Primary Pharmacology Group, Pfizer, Groton, Connecticut 06340, USA.
Jonathan A LeeDepartment of Quantitative Biology, Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana 46285, USA.
Jörg EderNovartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, 4002 Basel, Switzerland.
Marco PrunottoPhenotype and Target ID, Chemical Biology, pRED, Roche, 4070 Basel, Switzerland. Present address: Office of Innovation, Immunology, Infectious Diseases &Ophthalmology (I2O), Roche Late Stage Development, 124 Grenzacherstrasse, 4070 Basel, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phenotypic drug discovery (PDD) approaches do not rely on knowledge of the identity of a specific drug target or a hypothesis about its role in disease, in contrast to the target-based strategies that have been widely used in the pharmaceutical industry in the past three decades. However, in recent years, there has been a resurgence in interest in PDD approaches based on their potential to address the incompletely understood complexity of diseases and their promise of delivering first-in-class drugs, as well as major advances in the tools for cell-based phenotypic screening. Nevertheless, PDD approaches also have considerable challenges, such as hit validation and target deconvolution. This article focuses on the lessons learned by researchers engaged in PDD in the pharmaceutical industry and considers the impact of 'omics' knowledge in defining a cellular disease phenotype in the era of precision medicine, introducing the concept of a chain of translatability. We particularly aim to identify features and areas in which PDD can best deliver value to drug discovery portfolios and can contribute to the identification and the development of novel medicines, and to illustrate the challenges and uncertainties that are associated with PDD in order to help set realistic expectations with regard to its benefits and costs.

Indexed as

Drug DesignAnimalsDrug DiscoveryDrug IndustryHumansMolecular Targeted TherapyPhenotypePrecision Medicine

Identifiers

PMID28685762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.