ArticleEndoscopic ultrasound
Assessing tumor angiogenesis in colorectal cancer by quantitative contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound and molecular and immunohistochemical analysis.
Article in Endoscopic ultrasound. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.
- Proteomic Differentiation of Colorectal Cancer From Normal Tissue via Ex Vivo E-Biopsy: A Novel Approach to Molecular Sampling for Diagnostic Precision.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Predictive Value of TRUS and CEUS Parameters for Lymph Node Metastasis in Rectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
- Quantitative evaluation of colorectal tumour vasculature using contrast-enhanced ultrasound: Correlation with angiogenesis and prognostic significance.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2023Article
- Gastric Cancer Angiogenesis Assessment by Dynamic Contrast Harmonic Imaging Endoscopic Ultrasound (CHI-EUS) and Immunohistochemical Analysis-A Feasibility Study.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Article
- Anti-Angiogenic Treatment in Pseudomyxoma Peritonei-Still a Strong Preclinical Rationale.Cancers · 2021Article
- Preoperative rectal tumor embolization as an adjunctive tool for bloodless abdominoperineal excision: A case report.World journal of clinical oncology · 2020Article
- Progress in Endoscopic Treatment of Hemorrhoids.Journal of translational internal medicine · 2020Review
- Clinical significance of expression of fibrous sheath interacting protein 1 in colon cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- DysregulatedReports of biochemistry & molecular biology · 2019Article
- Contrast enhanced ultrasound imaging by nature-inspired ultrastable echogenic nanobubbles.Nanoscale · 2019Article
- shRNA-interfering LSD1 inhibits proliferation and invasion of gastric cancer cellsWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- Clinicopathological significance of human leukocyte antigen F-associated transcript 10 expression in colorectal cancer.World journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2019Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesData on contrast-enhanced endoscopic ultrasound (CE-EUS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) evaluation are scarce. Therefore, we aimed to assess the vascular perfusion pattern in CRC by quantitative CE-EUS and compare it to immunohistochemical and genetic markers of angiogenesis. PATIENTS AND
methodsWe performed a retrospective analysis of CE-EUS examinations of 42 CRC patients, before any therapy. CE-EUS movies were processed using a dedicated software. Ten parameters were automatically generated from the time-intensity curve (TIC) analysis: peak enhancement (PE), rise time (RT), mean transit time, time to peak (TTP), wash-in area under the curve (WiAUC), wash-in rate (WiR), wash-in perfusion index (WiPI), wash-out AUC (WoAUC), and wash-in and wash-out AUC (WiWoAUC). The expression levels of the vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1) and VEGFR2 genes were assessed from biopsy samples harvested during colonoscopy. Microvascular density and vascular area were calculated after CD31 and CD105 immunostaining.
resultsForty-two CE-EUS video sequences were analyzed. We found positive correlations between the parameters PE, WiAUC, WiR, WiPI, WoAUC, WiWoAUC, and N staging (Spearman r = 0.437, r = 0.336, r = 0.462, r = 0.437, r = 0.358, and r = 0.378, respectively, P < 0.05), and also between RT and TTP and CD31 vascular area (r = 0.415, and r = 0.421, respectively, P < 0.05). VEGFR1 and VEGFR2 expression did not correlate with any of the TIC parameters.
conclusionsCE-EUS with TIC analysis enables minimally invasive assessment of CRC angiogenesis and may provide information regarding the lymph nodes invasion. However, further studies are needed for defining its role in the evaluation of CRC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.