Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685723›Full record

ReviewChinese medical journal2017

Radiation Therapy in Keloids Treatment: History, Strategy, Effectiveness, and Complication.

Jing Xu, Elan Yang, Nan-Ze Yu, Xiao Long

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Chinese medical journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Future Directions About Keloid Scars Based on Pathogenesis and Therapies.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Scar-centered dilation in the treatment of large keloids.World journal of clinical cases · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jing XuPeking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
Elan YangDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Nan-Ze YuDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.
Xiao LongDepartment of Plastic Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing 100730, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveRadiation therapy combined with surgical excision was considered as one of the most effective treatment plans for keloid lesions. However, there was no unanimity found over present literatures regarding the issue on optimized treatment strategy for keloids. We here provide a comprehensive review over this issue and emphasize on the influencing factors. DATA SOURCES: The data analyzed in this review were searched from articles included in PubMed and EMBASE databases. STUDY SELECTION: The original articles and critical reviews discussing the application of radiation therapy in keloids treatment were selected for this review.

resultsThe application of radiation therapy has transitioned from simple superficial X-ray irradiation to brachytherapy. Furthermore, several factors including radiation type, dose, fraction, interval, and complications were reviewed, and the results revealed that these factors were significant toward clinical outcome at various levels.

conclusionsBoth past and present evidence support the idea that combination therapy of radiation and surgical therapy is safe and feasible. However, the optimization of treatment strategy was based on different radiation types and should take dose, fractions, interval, and complications into consideration, which will then decrease the rate of recurrence and increase the level of satisfaction.

Indexed as

BrachytherapyHumansKeloidRadiotherapyTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID28685723
PMCPMC5520560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.