ArticleThe neuroradiology journal2018
Misdiagnosis: CNS Erdheim-Chester disease mimicking CLIPPERS.
Article in The neuroradiology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- Delayed Neurologic Response to Dabrafenib and Trametinib in the Case of Mixed Histiocytosis (LCH/ECD): Case Report and Literature Review.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- "Crab sign" in an ataxia patient with central nervous system Erdheim Chester disease: a novel neuroimaging finding with review of literature.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Review
- Neuroimaging Spectrum of Erdheim-Chester Disease: An Image-Based Review.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Review
- Chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS): contemporary advances and current controversies.Journal of neurology · 2024Review
- Erdheim-Chester Disease.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
- Preceding polydipsia/polyuria, ataxia, and dysarthria in an adult with mixed histiocytosis (Erdheim Chester disease/Langerhans cell histiocytosis).Annals of hematology · 2022Article
- Brain biopsy in patients with CLIPPERS syndrome: why and when.Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders · 2022Article
- Peripheral T cell lymphoma after chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS): a case report.BMC neurology · 2019Article
- Neuroradiological and clinical features in ophthalmoplegia.Neuroradiology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction Chronic lymphocytic inflammation with pontine perivascular enhancement responsive to steroids (CLIPPERS) is an inflammatory central nervous system (CNS) disorder with particular involvement of the pons. Diagnostic criteria include a range of clinical symptoms related to the underlying brainstem pathology, visible with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRI findings include the appearance of punctuate and curvilinear gadolinium enhancement 'peppering' the pons. We discuss a patient presenting with clinical and radiographic characteristics of CLIPPERS who was diagnosed with Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD). Case report A 52-year-old male presented with 2 years of progressive spasticity, dysarthria, and gait instability. Initially, he was diagnosed with Parkinson's disease at an outside hospital, based on tremor, rigidity, and gait instability; however, he failed to improve with a trial of levodopa. Brain MRI showed small enhancing parenchymal nodules coalescing in the central pons, but also affecting the cerebellum and cerebellar peduncles, with more punctate enhancing lesions in the cerebral lobar subcortical white matter. When the patient's response to steroids was inadequate, further imaging was done, revealing perinephric processes. Subsequent biopsy revealed ECD. Conclusions A review of the literature for cases of CLIPPERS demonstrated a subset of patients later found to have various malignancies involving the CNS. This case report uses the patient's unique radiographic and clinical presentation to demonstrate the importance of the exclusion criteria within the CLIPPERS diagnostic requirements and stresses red flags suggestive of alternative diagnoses. This distinction is of high importance when differentiating a relatively benign process such as CLIPPERS from more malignant diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.