Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685459›Full record

ReviewAdvances in experimental medicine and biology2017

Using India Ink as a Sensor for Oximetry: Evidence of its Safety as a Medical Device.

Ann Barry Flood, Victoria A Wood, Harold M Swartz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Advances in experimental medicine and biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ann Barry FloodEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA. Ann.B.Flood@Dartmouth.edu.
Victoria A WoodEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Harold M SwartzEPR Center for the Study of Viable Systems at Dartmouth, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Project 3: Direct & Repeated Measurement of pO2 in Deep-seated Tumors using EPR OP01CA190193 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI WILLIAMS, BENJAMIN B · 2015 to 2019
$7.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA190193
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clinical EPR spectroscopy is emerging as an important modality, with the potential to be used in standard clinical practice to determine the extent of hypoxia in tissues and whether hypoxic tissues respond to breathing enriched oxygen during therapy. Oximetry can provide important information useful for prognosis and to improve patient outcomes. EPR oximetry has many potential advantages over other ways to measure oxygen in tissues, including directly measuring oxygen in tissues and being particularly sensitive to low oxygen, repeatable, and non-invasive after an initial injection of the EPR-sensing material is placed in the tumor. The most immediately available oxygen sensor is India ink, where two classes of carbon (carbon black and charcoal) have been identified as having acceptable paramagnetic properties for oximetry. While India ink has a long history of safe use in tattoos, a systematic research search regarding its safety for marking tissues for medical uses and an examination of the evidence that differentiates between ink based on charcoal or carbon black has not been conducted.

methodsUsing systematic literature search techniques, we searched the PubMed and Food and Drug Administration databases, finding ~1000 publications reporting on adverse events associated with India/carbon based inks. The detailed review of outcomes was based on studies involving >16 patients, where the ink was identifiable as carbon black or charcoal.

resultsFifty-six studies met these criteria. There were few reports of complications other than transient and usually mild discomfort and bleeding at injection, and there was no difference in charcoal vs. carbon black India ink.

conclusionsIndia ink was generally well tolerated by patients and physicians reported that it was easy to use in practice and used few resources. The risk is low enough to justify its use as an oxygen sensor in clinical practice.

Indexed as

CarbonElectron Spin Resonance SpectroscopyAnimalsBiosensing TechniquesColoring AgentsHumansOximetryCarbonchinese inkColoring AgentsAdverse EventsCarbon particlesEPR sensotIndia inkStructured literature review

Identifiers

PMID28685459
PMCPMC5973822
OpenAlexW2733611013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.