Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685396›Full record

Trial reportThe AAPS journal2017

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacogenomics of Bupropion in Three Different Formulations with Different Release Kinetics in Healthy Human Volunteers.

Jamie N Connarn, Stephanie Flowers, Marisa Kelly, Ruijuan Luo, Kristen M Ward, Gloria Harrington, Ila Moncion, Masoud Kamali, Melivin McInnis, Meihua R Feng and 4 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in The AAPS journal, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jamie N ConnarnDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, USA.
Stephanie FlowersDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Marisa KellyPrechter Bipolar Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ruijuan LuoDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, USA.
Kristen M WardDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Gloria HarringtonPrechter Bipolar Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Ila MoncionDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, USA.
Masoud KamaliPrechter Bipolar Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Melivin McInnisPrechter Bipolar Research Group, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Meihua R FengDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, USA.
Vicki EllingrodDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Andrew BabiskinOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Xinyuan ZhangOffice of Research and Standards, Office of Generic Drugs, Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Duxin SunDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, College of Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48105, USA. duxins@med.umich.edu.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this pharmacokinetics (PK) study was to investigate whether different release kinetics from bupropion hydrochloride (HCl) immediate release (IR), sustained release (SR), and extended release (ER) formulations alter its metabolism and to test the hypothesis that the unsuccessful bioequivalence (BE) study of the higher strength (300 mg) of bupropion HCl ER tablets based on the successful BE study of the lower strength (150 mg) was due to metabolic saturation in the gastrointestinal (GI) lumen. A randomized six-way crossover study was conducted in healthy volunteers. During each period, subjects took a single dose of IR (75/100 mg), SR (100/150 mg), or ER (150/300 mg) formulations of bupropion HCl; plasma samples for PK analysis were collected from 0-96 h for all formulations. In addition, each subject's whole blood was collected for the genotyping of various single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of bupropion's major metabolic enzymes. The data indicates that the relative bioavailability of the ER formulations was 72.3-78.8% compared with IR 75 mg. No differences were observed for ratio of the area under the curve (AUC) of metabolite to AUC of parent for the three major metabolites. The pharmacogenomics analysis suggested no statistically significant correlation between polymorphisms and PK parameters of the various formulations. Altogether, these data suggested that the different release kinetics of the formulations did not change metabolites-to-parent ratio. Therefore, the differing BE result between the 150 and 300 mg bupropion HCl ER tablets was unlikely due to the metabolic saturation in the GI lumen caused by different release patterns.

Indexed as

PharmacogeneticsAdultBupropionCross-Over StudiesDelayed-Action PreparationsDrug CompoundingDrug LiberationFemaleHealthy VolunteersHumansMaleMiddle AgedTabletsTherapeutic EquivalencyBupropionDelayed-Action PreparationsTabletsbioequivalencebupropioncarbonyl reductaseCYP2B6metabolism

Identifiers

PMID28685396
OpenAlexW2726338622

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.