ArticlePharmaceutical research2017
Benchmarking of Human Dose Prediction for Inhaled Medicines from Preclinical In Vivo Data.
Article in Pharmaceutical research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimization of Long-Acting Bronchodilator Dose Ratios Using Isolated Guinea Pig Tracheal Rings for Synergistic Combination Therapy in Asthma and COPD.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Translational model to predict pulmonary pharmacokinetics and efficacy in man for inhaled bronchodilators.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeA scientifically robust prediction of human dose is important in determining whether to progress a candidate drug into clinical development. A particular challenge for inhaled medicines is that unbound drug concentrations at the pharmacological target site cannot be easily measured or predicted. In the absence of such data, alternative empirical methods can be useful. This work is a post hoc analysis based on preclinical in vivo pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) data with the aim to evaluate such approaches and provide guidance on clinically effective dose prediction for inhaled medicines.
methodsFive empirically based methodologies were applied on a diverse set of marketed inhaled therapeutics (inhaled corticosteroids and bronchodilators). The approaches include scaling of dose based on body weight or body surface area and variants of PK/PD approaches aiming to predict the therapeutic dose based on having efficacious concentrations of drug in the lung over the dosing interval.
resultsThe most robust predictions of dose were made by body weight adjustment (90% within 3-fold) and by a specific PK/PD approach aiming for an average predicted 75% effect level during the dosing interval (80% within 3-fold). Scaling of dose based on body surface area consistently under predicted the therapeutic dose.
conclusionsPreclinical in vivo data and empirical scaling to man can be used as a baseline method for clinical dose predictions of inhaled medicines. The development of more sophisticated translational models utilizing free drug concentration and target engagement data is a desirable build.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.