Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685228›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Relationship Between Coronary Contrast-Flow Quantitative Flow Ratio and Myocardial Ischemia Assessed by SPECT MPI.

Jeff M Smit, Gerhard Koning, Alexander R van Rosendael, Petra Dibbets-Schneider, Bart J Mertens, J Wouter Jukema, Victoria Delgado, Johan H C Reiber, Jeroen J Bax, Arthur J Scholte

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Comparison of 2D-QCA, 3D-QCA and coronary angiography derived FFR in predicting myocardial ischemia assessed by CZT-SPECT MPI.Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Functional coronary angiography for the assessment of the epicardial vessels and the microcirculation.EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeff M SmitDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postal zone 2300 RC, Leiden, ZA, 2333, The Netherlands.
Gerhard KoningMedis medical imaging systems B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.
Alexander R van RosendaelDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postal zone 2300 RC, Leiden, ZA, 2333, The Netherlands.
Petra Dibbets-SchneiderDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Bart J MertensDepartment of Medical Statistics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Wouter JukemaDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postal zone 2300 RC, Leiden, ZA, 2333, The Netherlands.
Victoria DelgadoDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postal zone 2300 RC, Leiden, ZA, 2333, The Netherlands.
Johan H C ReiberMedis medical imaging systems B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.
Jeroen J BaxDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postal zone 2300 RC, Leiden, ZA, 2333, The Netherlands.
Arthur J ScholteDepartment of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, Postal zone 2300 RC, Leiden, ZA, 2333, The Netherlands. a.j.h.a.scholte@lumc.nl.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeA new method has been developed to calculate fractional flow reserve (FFR) from invasive coronary angiography, the so-called "contrast-flow quantitative flow ratio (cQFR)". Recently, cQFR was compared to invasive FFR in intermediate coronary lesions showing an overall diagnostic accuracy of 85%. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between cQFR and myocardial ischemia assessed by single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging (SPECT MPI).

methodsPatients who underwent SPECT MPI and coronary angiography within 3 months were included. The cQFR computation was performed offline, using dedicated software. The cQFR computation was based on 3-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) and computational fluid dynamics. The standard 17-segment model was used to determine the vascular territories. Myocardial ischemia was defined as a summed difference score ≥2 in a vascular territory. A cQFR of ≤0.80 was considered abnormal.

resultsTwo hundred and twenty-four coronary arteries were analysed in 85 patients. Overall accuracy of cQFR to detect ischemia on SPECT MPI was 90%. In multivariable analysis, cQFR was independently associated with ischemia on SPECT MPI (OR per 0.01 decrease of cQFR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.04-1.18, p = 0.002), whereas clinical and QCA parameters were not. Furthermore, cQFR showed incremental value for the detection of ischemia compared to clinical and QCA parameters (global chi square 48.7 to 62.6; p <0.001).

conclusionsA good relationship between cQFR and SPECT MPI was found. cQFR was independently associated with ischemia on SPECT MPI and showed incremental value to detect ischemia compared to clinical and QCA parameters.

Indexed as

Fractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialAgedCoronary AngiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial IschemiaMyocardial Perfusion ImagingTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-PhotonComputational fluid dynamicsCoronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserveNon-invasive imagingQuantitative coronary angiography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.