Trial reportHeart and vessels2017
Time course of the antiplatelet effect after switching to clopidogrel from initial prasugrel therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Trial report in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparison of the effects of ticagrelor and clopidogrel on heart rate variability and heart rate turbulence in patients with percutaneous coronary interventions.Journal of the Saudi Heart Association · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Prasugrel is often replaced with clopidogrel after a certain period of time following coronary stenting. However, the time course of platelet aggregation during this replacement is unknown. We performed a prospective, single-arm study to monitor platelet reactivity before and after the replacement. Forty-five patients (mean age 62.6 ± 13 years, 40 male) who received coronary stenting for acute coronary syndrome were initially treated with the loading dose (20 mg) of prasugrel followed by the maintenance dose (3.75 mg/day) for 7 days, then switched to 75 mg/day of clopidogrel. The P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) level was measured at baseline and selected time points. Prasugrel effectively suppressed PRU from 248 ± 59 at baseline to 145 ± 65 on day 1 (P < 0.001). The PRU value on the final day of prasugrel treatment (day 7) was 156 ± 68 (P < 0.001 vs. baseline). After switching to clopidogrel, PRU was consistently suppressed [146 ± 60, 139 ± 54, and 135 ± 60 on days 9, 11, and 13, respectively (P < 0.001, each point vs. baseline)]. Switching from the initial prasugrel therapy to clopidogrel using the maintenance dose does not cause a drug efficacy gap and stays effective for preventing stent thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.