Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685204›Full record

Trial reportHeart and vessels2017

Time course of the antiplatelet effect after switching to clopidogrel from initial prasugrel therapy in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

Erito Furuse, Hitoshi Takano, Takeshi Yamamoto, Yoshiaki Kubota, Takashi Yoshizane, Mitsunobu Kitamura, Hideki Miyachi, Yusuke Hosokawa, Wataru Shimizu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Heart and vessels, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 43% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Erito FuruseDivision of Intensive Cardiovascular Care, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Hitoshi TakanoDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan. htakano@nms.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8821-4884
Takeshi YamamotoDivision of Intensive Cardiovascular Care, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Yoshiaki KubotaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
Takashi YoshizaneDivision of Intensive Cardiovascular Care, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsunobu KitamuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Nippon Medical School, 1-1-5 Sendagi, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan.
Hideki MiyachiDivision of Intensive Cardiovascular Care, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Yusuke HosokawaDivision of Intensive Cardiovascular Care, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Wataru ShimizuDivision of Intensive Cardiovascular Care, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan.
Nippon Medical School · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prasugrel is often replaced with clopidogrel after a certain period of time following coronary stenting. However, the time course of platelet aggregation during this replacement is unknown. We performed a prospective, single-arm study to monitor platelet reactivity before and after the replacement. Forty-five patients (mean age 62.6 ± 13 years, 40 male) who received coronary stenting for acute coronary syndrome were initially treated with the loading dose (20 mg) of prasugrel followed by the maintenance dose (3.75 mg/day) for 7 days, then switched to 75 mg/day of clopidogrel. The P2Y12 reaction unit (PRU) level was measured at baseline and selected time points. Prasugrel effectively suppressed PRU from 248 ± 59 at baseline to 145 ± 65 on day 1 (P < 0.001). The PRU value on the final day of prasugrel treatment (day 7) was 156 ± 68 (P < 0.001 vs. baseline). After switching to clopidogrel, PRU was consistently suppressed [146 ± 60, 139 ± 54, and 135 ± 60 on days 9, 11, and 13, respectively (P < 0.001, each point vs. baseline)]. Switching from the initial prasugrel therapy to clopidogrel using the maintenance dose does not cause a drug efficacy gap and stays effective for preventing stent thrombosis.

Indexed as

Acute Coronary SyndromeClopidogrelCoronary AngiographyDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug SubstitutionFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPercutaneous Coronary InterventionPlatelet AggregationPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochlorideProspective StudiesTiclopidineClopidogrelPlatelet Aggregation InhibitorsPrasugrel HydrochlorideTiclopidineCoronary stentDual antiplatelet therapyP2Y12 reaction unitPercutaneous coronary interventionPeriprocedural myocardial injuryStent thrombosis

Identifiers

PMID28685204
OpenAlexW2729454097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.