Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685048›Full record

ArticleJournal of global health2017

Prioritizing research for integrated implementation of early childhood development and maternal, newborn, child and adolescent health and nutrition platforms.

Renee Sharma, Michelle F Gaffey, Harold Alderman, Diego G Bassani, Kimber Bogard, Gary L Darmstadt, Jai K Das, Joseph E de Graft-Johnson, Jena D Hamadani, Susan Horton and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of global health, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Renee SharmaCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle F GaffeyCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Harold AldermanInternational Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC, USA.
Diego G BassaniCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kimber BogardNational Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine, Washington, DC, USA.
Gary L DarmstadtDepartment of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA.
Jai K DasCenter of Excellence in Women and Child Health, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Joseph E de Graft-JohnsonMaternal and Child Survival Program; Save the Children, Washington, DC, USA.
Jena D HamadaniInternational Centre for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Susan HortonSchool of Public Health and Health Systems, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
Luis HuichoCentro de Investigación para el Desarrollo Integral y Sostenible, Centro de Investigación en Salud Materna e Infantil, and School of Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru.
Julia HusseinThe Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Stephen LyeFraser Mustard Institute for Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Rafael Pérez-EscamillaDepartment of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Kerrie ProulxFraser Mustard Institute for Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Kofi MarfoAga Khan University (South-Central Asia, East Africa, UK), Nairobi, Kenya.
Vanessa Mathews-HannaWorld Renew, Burlington, Ontario, Canada.
Mireille S McleanThe Sackler Institute for Nutrition Science at the New York Academy of Sciences, New York, New York, USA.
Atif RahmanInstitute Of Psychology, Health And Society, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Karlee L SilverGrand Challenges Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Daisy R SinglaSinai Health System; Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute; Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Patrick WebbFriedman School of Nutrition Science and Policy, Tufts University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Zulfiqar A BhuttaCentre for Global Child Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundExisting health and nutrition services present potential platforms for scaling up delivery of early childhood development (ECD) interventions within sensitive windows across the life course, especially in the first 1000 days from conception to age 2 years. However, there is insufficient knowledge on how to optimize implementation for such strategies in an integrated manner. In light of this knowledge gap, we aimed to systematically identify a set of integrated implementation research priorities for health, nutrition and early child development within the 2015 to 2030 timeframe of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

methodsWe applied the Child Health and Nutrition Research Initiative method, and consulted a diverse group of global health experts to develop and score 57 research questions against five criteria: answerability, effectiveness, deliverability, impact, and effect on equity. These questions were ranked using a research priority score, and the average expert agreement score was calculated for each question.

findingsThe research priority scores ranged from 61.01 to 93.52, with a median of 82.87. The average expert agreement scores ranged from 0.50 to 0.90, with a median of 0.75. The top-ranked research question were: i) "How can interventions and packages to reduce neonatal mortality be expanded to include ECD and stimulation interventions?"; ii) "How does the integration of ECD and MNCAH&N interventions affect human resource requirements and capacity development in resource-poor settings?"; and iii) "How can integrated interventions be tailored to vulnerable refugee and migrant populations to protect against poor ECD and MNCAH&N outcomes?". Most highly-ranked research priorities varied across the life course and highlighted key aspects of scaling up coverage of integrated interventions in resource-limited settings, including: workforce and capacity development, cost-effectiveness and strategies to reduce financial barriers, and quality assessment of programs.

conclusionsInvesting in ECD is critical to achieving several of the SDGs, including SDG 2 on ending all forms of malnutrition, SDG 3 on ensuring health and well-being for all, and SDG 4 on ensuring inclusive and equitable quality education and promotion of life-long learning opportunities for all. The generated research agenda is expected to drive action and investment on priority approaches to integrating ECD interventions within existing health and nutrition services.

Indexed as

ResearchAdolescentChildChild DevelopmentChild, PreschoolDelivery of Health Care, IntegratedFemaleGlobal HealthHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaternal-Child Health ServicesNutritional StatusPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID28685048
PMCPMC5481896

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.