Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28685024›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of obesity supplements2016

Bugs, guts and brains, and the regulation of food intake and body weight.

M K Hamilton, H E Raybould

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of obesity supplements, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

M K HamiltonDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, USA.
H E RaybouldDepartment of Anatomy, Physiology and Cell Biology, UC Davis School of Veterinary Medicine, Davis, CA, USA.

Funding

CHOLECYSTOKININ--ROLE IN POSTPRANDIAL GASTRIC MOTILITYR01DK041004 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RAYBOULD, HELEN E · 1995 to 2019
$5.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK041004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The microbiota-gut-brain axis is currently being explored in many types of rodent models, including models of behavioral, neurodegenerative and metabolic disorders. Our laboratory is interested in determining the mechanisms and consequences of activation of vagal afferent neurons that lead to activation of parasympathetic reflexes and changes in feeding behavior in the context of obesity. Obesity is associated with microbial dysbiosis, decreased intestinal barrier function, gut inflammation, metabolic endotoxemia, chronic low-grade systemic inflammation and desensitization of vagal afferent nerves. This review will present the evidence that altered gut microbiota together with decreased gut barrier function allows the passage of bacterial components or metabolites in obese individuals, leading to the disruption of vagal afferent signaling and consequently resulting in an increase in body weight. We first review the most recent descriptions of gut microbial dysbiosis due to a high fat diet and describe changes in the gut barrier and the evidence of increased intestinal permeability in obesity. We then will review the evidence to show how manipulating the gut microbiota via pre and probiotics can restore gut barrier function and prevent weight gain. Lastly, we present possible mechanisms by which the microbe-gut-brain axis may have a role in obesity. The studies mentioned in this review have provided new targets to treat and prevent obesity and have highlighted how the microbiota-gut-brain axis is involved.

Identifiers

PMID28685024
PMCPMC5485880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.