Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28684880›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Genomic and phenotypic analysis of Vavilov's historic landraces reveals the impact of environment and genomic islands of agronomic traits.

Elena Plekhanova, Margarita A Vishnyakova, Sergey Bulyntsev, Peter L Chang, Noelia Carrasquilla-Garcia, Kassaye Negash, Eric von Wettberg, Nina Noujdina, Douglas R Cook, Maria G Samsonova and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Toward the sequence-based breeding in legumes in the post-genome sequencing era.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2019
    Review
  10. Healthy and sustainable diets for future generations.Journal of the science of food and agriculture · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Elena PlekhanovaDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Margarita A VishnyakovaFederal Research Centre All-Russian N.I. Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), St. Petersburg, Russia.
Sergey BulyntsevFederal Research Centre All-Russian N.I. Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), St. Petersburg, Russia.
Peter L ChangDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Noelia Carrasquilla-GarciaDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Kassaye NegashDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Eric von WettbergDepartment of Biological Sciences and International Center for Tropical Botany, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA.
Nina NoujdinaSchool of Architecture, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Douglas R CookDepartment of Plant Pathology, University of California, Davis, CA, USA.
Maria G SamsonovaDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia.
Sergey V NuzhdinDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Peter the Great St.Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg, Russia. snuzhdin@usc.edu.
University of California, Davis · USN.I. Vavilov Research Institute of Plant Industry · RUPeter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University · RUUniversity of Southern California · USFlorida International University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Vavilov Institute of Plant Genetic Resources (VIR), in St. Petersburg, Russia, houses a unique genebank, with historical collections of landraces. When they were collected, the geographical distribution and genetic diversity of most crops closely reflected their historical patterns of cultivation established over the preceding millennia. We employed a combination of genomics, computational biology and phenotyping to characterize VIR's 147 chickpea accessions from Turkey and Ethiopia, representing chickpea's center of origin and a major location of secondary diversity. Genotyping by sequencing identified 14,059 segregating polymorphisms and genome-wide association studies revealed 28 GWAS hits in potential candidate genes likely to affect traits of agricultural importance. The proportion of polymorphisms shared among accessions is a strong predictor of phenotypic resemblance, and of environmental similarity between historical sampling sites. We found that 20 out of 28 polymorphisms, associated with multiple traits, including days to maturity, plant phenology, and yield-related traits such as pod number, localized to chromosome 4. We hypothesize that selection and introgression via inadvertent hybridization between more and less advanced morphotypes might have resulted in agricultural improvement genes being aggregated to genomic 'agro islands', and in genotype-to-phenotype relationships resembling widespread pleiotropy.

Indexed as

Crops, AgriculturalGenome, PlantGenomic IslandsPolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait, HeritableCicerComputational BiologyDatabases, GeneticEthiopiaGenetic PleiotropyGenome-Wide Association StudyGenotypePhenotypePhylogenyQuantitative Trait LociRussia

Identifiers

PMID28684880
PMCPMC5500531
OpenAlexW2732634751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.