Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28684867›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

Combined Magnetomotive ultrasound, PET/CT, and MR imaging of

Maria Evertsson, Pontus Kjellman, Magnus Cinthio, Roger Andersson, Thuy A Tran, Rene In't Zandt, Gustav Grafström, Hanna Toftevall, Sarah Fredriksson, Christian Ingvar and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 87 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Exploring innovative strides in radiolabeled nanoparticle progress for multimodality cancer imaging and theranostic applications.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Nanotechnology-Assisted Cell Tracking.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Single Magnetic Particle Motion in Magnetomotive Ultrasound: An Analytical Model and Experimental Validation.IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Maria EvertssonDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering LTH at Lund University, Lund, Sweden. maria.evertsson@med.lu.se.
Pontus KjellmanLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden.
Magnus CinthioDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering LTH at Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Roger AnderssonMedical Services, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Thuy A TranLund University Bioimaging Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Rene In't ZandtLund University Bioimaging Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Gustav GrafströmLund University Bioimaging Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Hanna ToftevallGenovis AB, Lund, Sweden.
Sarah FredrikssonGenovis AB, Lund, Sweden.
Christian IngvarDepartment of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Sven-Erik StrandLund University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Medical Radiation Physics, Lund, Sweden.
Tomas JanssonMedical Services, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden.
Lund University · SESkåne University Hospital · SEGenovis (Sweden) · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current methods for intra-surgical guidance to localize metastases at cancer surgery are based on radioactive tracers that cause logistical challenges. We propose the use of a novel ultrasound-based method, magnetomotive ultrasound (MMUS) imaging that employ a nanoparticle-based contrast agent that also may be used for pre-operative PET/MRI imaging. Since MMUS is radiation free, this eliminates the dependence between pre- and intra-operative imaging and the radiation exposure for the surgical staff. This study investigates a hypothetical clinical scenario of pre-operative PET imaging, combined with intra-operative MMUS imaging, implemented in a sentinel lymph node (SLN) rat model. At one-hour post injection of

Indexed as

AnimalsContrast MediaFemaleFerric CompoundsGallium RadioisotopesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMagnetite NanoparticlesPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRatsRats, WistarSentinel Lymph NodeSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyStaining and LabelingTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyContrast MediaFerric Compoundsferric oxideGallium-68Gallium RadioisotopesMagnetite Nanoparticles

Identifiers

PMID28684867
PMCPMC5500498
OpenAlexW2726634163

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.