ArticleScientific reports2017
Serum D-dimer is a potential predictor for thromboembolism complications in patients with renal biopsy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Acute left ovarian vein thrombosis following percutaneous renal biopsy: A case report.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Proteoglycans as Biomarkers of Medial Degeneration in Acute Stanford Type A Aortic Dissection.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Review
- Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) as a Biomarker for Cancer-Associated Venous Thrombosis: A Meta-analysis.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- A dynamic online nomogram for predicting renal outcomes of idiopathic membranous nephropathy.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2024Article
- Coagulation parameters are associated with the prognosis of immunoglobulin a nephropathy: a retrospective study.BMC nephrology · 2020Article
- Manual compression and reflex syncope in native renal biopsy.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Renal biopsy has been widely recommended in clinic to determine the histological patterns of kidney disease. To prevent bleeding complications, patients should routinely stop anticoagulants prior to renal biopsy. However, patients with kidney disease are susceptible to thromboembolisms, particularly in those with severe hypoalbuminemia. This study was designed to investigate the application of serum D-dimer as a predictor for thrombotic events after renal biopsy. 400 consecutive native renal biopsies were prospectively included in this 2-month follow-up study. The overall incidence of bleeding and thrombotic complication is 4%, including hematuria or large perinephric hematoma (2.5%, n = 10) and thrombotic complication (1.5%, n = 6). Compared to low serum D-dimer (<2.00 μg/ml), subjects in the group of high serum D-dimer (≥2.00 μg/ml) were more incline to develop thrombotic complications (9.1% versus 0.3%; RR, 30.33; p < 0.001). D-dimer correlated positively with age (r
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.