Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28684773›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2017

The temporal dependence of exploration on neotic style in birds.

Mark O'Hara, Berenika Mioduszewska, Auguste von Bayern, Alice Auersperg, Thomas Bugnyar, Anna Wilkinson, Ludwig Huber, Gyula Koppany Gajdon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Matching-to-Sample Task Training of a Killer Whale (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Mark O'HaraDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria. mark.ohara@univie.ac.at.
Berenika MioduszewskaMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Auguste von BayernMax Planck Institute for Ornithology, Seewiesen, Germany.
Alice AuerspergMesserli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Thomas BugnyarDepartment of Cognitive Biology, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Anna WilkinsonSchool of Life Sciences, University of Lincoln, Lincoln, United Kingdom.
Ludwig HuberMesserli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
Gyula Koppany GajdonMesserli Research Institute, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Medical University Vienna, University of Vienna, Wien, Austria.
University of Vienna · ATMax Planck Institute for Ornithology · DEUniversity of Veterinary Medicine Vienna · ATUniversity of Lincoln · GB

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 29075
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Exploration (interacting with objects to gain information) and neophobia (avoiding novelty) are considered independent traits shaped by the socio-ecology of a given species. However, in the literature it is often assumed that neophobia inhibits exploration. Here, we investigate how different approaches to novelty (fast or slow) determine the time at which exploration is likely to occur across a number of species. We presented four corvid and five parrot species with a touchscreen discrimination task in which novel stimuli were occasionally interspersed within the familiar training stimuli. We investigated the likelihood that an animal would choose novelty at different stages of its training and found evidence for a shift in the pattern of exploration, depending on neotic style. The findings suggest that faster approaching individuals explored earlier, whilst animals with long initial approach latencies showed similar amounts of exploration but did so later in training. Age rather than species might have influenced the amount of total exploration, with juveniles exploring more than adults. Neotic style varied consistently only for one species and seems to involve a strong individual component, rather than being a purely species-specific trait. This suggests that variation in behavioural phenotypes within a species may be adaptive.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PhysiologicalAge FactorsAnimalsChoice BehaviorExploratory BehaviorFemaleLikelihood FunctionsMaleParrotsPattern Recognition, VisualSongbirdsSpecies SpecificityTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID28684773
PMCPMC5500574
OpenAlexW2726887866

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.