Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28684665›Full record

ReviewNanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2017

Recent Advances in Magnetic Microfluidic Biosensors.

Ioanna Giouroudi, Georgios Kokkinis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Modular Fabrication of Microfluidic Graphene FET for Nucleic Acids Biosensing.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Application of Magnonic Crystals in Magnetic Bead Detection.Nanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Magnetic Particles for Advanced Molecular Diagnosis.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ioanna GiouroudiInstitute of Sensor and Actuator Systems, Vienna University of Technology, Gusshausstrasse 27-29/366-MNS, Vienna 1040, Austria. ioanna.giouroudi@gmail.com.
Georgios KokkinisInstitute of Sensor and Actuator Systems, Vienna University of Technology, Gusshausstrasse 27-29/366-MNS, Vienna 1040, Austria. georgios.kokkinis@tuwien.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF P 28544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of portable biosening devices for the detection of biological entities such as biomolecules, pathogens, and cells has become extremely significant over the past years. Scientific research, driven by the promise for miniaturization and integration of complex laboratory equipment on inexpensive, reliable, and accurate devices, has successfully shifted several analytical and diagnostic methods to the submillimeter scale. The miniaturization process was made possible with the birth of microfluidics, a technology that could confine, manipulate, and mix very small volumes of liquids on devices integrated on standard silicon technology chips. Such devices are then directly translating the presence of these entities into an electronic signal that can be read out with a portable instrumentation. For the aforementioned tasks, the use of magnetic markers (magnetic particles-MPs-functionalized with ligands) in combination with the application of magnetic fields is being strongly investigated by research groups worldwide. The greatest merits of using magnetic fields are that they can be applied either externally or from integrated microconductors and they can be well-tuned by adjusting the applied current on the microconductors. Moreover, the magnetic markers can be manipulated inside microfluidic channels by high gradient magnetic fields that can in turn be detected by magnetic sensors. All the above make this technology an ideal candidate for the development of such microfluidic biosensors. In this review, focus is given only to very recent advances in biosensors that use microfluidics in combination with magnetic sensors and magnetic markers/nanoparticles.

Indexed as

magnetic biosensorsmagnetic markersmicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID28684665
PMCPMC5535237

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.