Challenge to Coordinate Harmonization Activities on an International Level.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Towards harmonization of directly measured free 25-hydroxyvitamin D using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2022
   Article
2. Comments on Deng, et al: The potential for Isotope dilution-LC-MS/MS to improve laboratory measurement of c-peptide; reasons and critical determinants.Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab · 2021
   Article
3. Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry as a Reference Method to Evaluate Serum Calcium Measurement Bias and the Commutability of Processed Materials during Routine Measurements.Chinese medical journal · 2018
   Article

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Implementing a Reference Measurement System for C-Peptide: Successes and Lessons Learned.2017

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as