Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28683828›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2017

VirFinder: a novel k-mer based tool for identifying viral sequences from assembled metagenomic data.

Jie Ren, Nathan A Ahlgren, Yang Young Lu, Jed A Fuhrman, Fengzhu Sun

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 376 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
376citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
38.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

376 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 683 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. CAMELLIA: an alignment-free pipeline integratingNAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article

316 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Jie RenMolecular and Computational Biology Program, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Nathan A AhlgrenDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, 3616 Trousdale Pkwy, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. nahlgren@clarku.edu.
Yang Young LuMolecular and Computational Biology Program, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Jed A FuhrmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, 3616 Trousdale Pkwy, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA.
Fengzhu SunMolecular and Computational Biology Program, University of Southern California, 1050 Childs Way, Los Angeles, CA, 90089, USA. fsun@usc.edu.
University of Southern California · USFudan University · CN

Funding

Computational Studies of Virus-host Interactions Using Metagenomics Data and ApplicationsR01GM120624 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI AHLGREN, NATHAN, SUN, FENGZHU · 2017 to 2020
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM120624
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIdentifying viral sequences in mixed metagenomes containing both viral and host contigs is a critical first step in analyzing the viral component of samples. Current tools for distinguishing prokaryotic virus and host contigs primarily use gene-based similarity approaches. Such approaches can significantly limit results especially for short contigs that have few predicted proteins or lack proteins with similarity to previously known viruses.

methodsWe have developed VirFinder, the first k-mer frequency based, machine learning method for virus contig identification that entirely avoids gene-based similarity searches. VirFinder instead identifies viral sequences based on our empirical observation that viruses and hosts have discernibly different k-mer signatures. VirFinder's performance in correctly identifying viral sequences was tested by training its machine learning model on sequences from host and viral genomes sequenced before 1 January 2014 and evaluating on sequences obtained after 1 January 2014.

resultsVirFinder had significantly better rates of identifying true viral contigs (true positive rates (TPRs)) than VirSorter, the current state-of-the-art gene-based virus classification tool, when evaluated with either contigs subsampled from complete genomes or assembled from a simulated human gut metagenome. For example, for contigs subsampled from complete genomes, VirFinder had 78-, 2.4-, and 1.8-fold higher TPRs than VirSorter for 1, 3, and 5 kb contigs, respectively, at the same false positive rates as VirSorter (0, 0.003, and 0.006, respectively), thus VirFinder works considerably better for small contigs than VirSorter. VirFinder furthermore identified several recently sequenced virus genomes (after 1 January 2014) that VirSorter did not and that have no nucleotide similarity to previously sequenced viruses, demonstrating VirFinder's potential advantage in identifying novel viral sequences. Application of VirFinder to a set of human gut metagenomes from healthy and liver cirrhosis patients reveals higher viral diversity in healthy individuals than cirrhosis patients. We also identified contig bins containing crAssphage-like contigs with higher abundance in healthy patients and a putative Veillonella genus prophage associated with cirrhosis patients.

conclusionsThis innovative k-mer based tool complements gene-based approaches and will significantly improve prokaryotic viral sequence identification, especially for metagenomic-based studies of viral ecology.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralSoftwareComputational BiologyDNA, ViralGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansLiver CirrhosisMachine LearningMetagenomeMetagenomicsPhylogenySequence Analysis, DNADNA, ViralHuman gutk-merLiver cirrhosisMetagenomeVirus

Identifiers

PMID28683828
PMCPMC5501583
OpenAlexW2732139758

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.