Trial reportTrials2017
Benefits and challenges of using the cohort multiple randomised controlled trial design for testing an intervention for depression.
Trial report in Trials, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing clinical scientific research: the cohort intervention random sampling study with historical controls.Journal of comparative effectiveness research · 2025Article
- Successful completion of large, low-cost randomized cancer trials at an academic cancer center.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2025Article
- Article
- Randomised trials conducted using cohorts: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2024Article
- Review
- Perpetual observational studies: new strategies to support efficient implementation of observational studies and randomized trials in infectious diseases.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022Article
- Patient accrual and understanding of informed consent in a two-stage consent design.Clinical trials (London, England) · 2021Article
- Integrating trials into a whole-population cohort of children and parents: statement of intent (trials) for the Generation Victoria (GenV) cohort.BMC medical research methodology · 2020Review
- CHI study: protocol for an observational cohort study on ageing and mental health in community-dwelling older adults.BMJ open · 2020Article
- The importance of different frailty domains in a population based sample in England.BMC geriatrics · 2020Article
- Article
- The cohort multiple randomized controlled trial design was found to be highly susceptible to low statistical power and internal validity biases.Journal of clinical epidemiology · 2018Article
- Protocol for the development of a CONSORT extension for RCTs using cohorts and routinely collected health data.Research integrity and peer review · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTrials which test the effectiveness of interventions compared with the status quo frequently encounter challenges. The cohort multiple randomised controlled trial (cmRCT) design is an innovative approach to the design and conduct of pragmatic trials which seeks to address some of these challenges. MAIN TEXT: In this article, we report our experiences with the first completed randomised controlled trial (RCT) using the cmRCT design. This trial-the Depression in South Yorkshire (DEPSY) trial-involved comparison of treatment as usual (TAU) with TAU plus the offer of an intervention for people with self-reported long-term moderate to severe depression. In the trial, we used an existing large population-based cohort: the Yorkshire Health Study. We discuss our experiences with recruitment, attrition, crossover, data analysis, generalisability of results, and cost. The main challenges in using the cmRCT design were the high crossover to the control group and the lower questionnaire response rate among patients who refused the offer of treatment. However, the design did help facilitate efficient and complete recruitment of the trial population as well as analysable data that were generalisable to the population of interest. Attrition rates were also smaller than those reported in other depression trials.
conclusionThis first completed full trial using the cmRCT design testing an intervention for self-reported depression was associated with a number of important benefits. Further research is required to compare the acceptability and cost effectiveness of standard pragmatic RCT design with the cmRCT design.
trial registrationISRCTN registry: ISRCTN02484593 . Registered on 7 Jan 2013.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.