ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2017
Security controls in an integrated Biobank to protect privacy in data sharing: rationale and study design.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- Toward a Common Set of Interface Requirements for Genomic Data Management: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Unlocking the potential of Asian genomic data: a collaborative framework for precision medicine innovation.GigaScience · 2026Review
- Lessons from national biobank projects utilizing whole-genome sequencing for population-scale genomics.Genomics & informatics · 2025Review
- Returning genetic risk information for hereditary cancers to participants in a population-based cohort study in Japan.Journal of human genetics · 2025Article
- Establishing a Pregnancy Lyme Disease Biobank.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- GBA/GBN-position on the feedback of incidental findings in biobank-based research: consensus-based workflow for hospital-based biobanks.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2023Article
- Tohoku Medical Megabank Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study: Rationale, Design, and Background.JMA journal · 2023Review
- A leap of faith: building the trust in human biobanks.Frontiers in genetics · 2023Article
- Collection and use of human materials during TB clinical research; a review of practices.BMC medical ethics · 2022Review
- The return of individual genomic results to research participants: design and pilot study of Tohoku Medical Megabank Project.Journal of human genetics · 2022Article
- Japonica Array NEO with increased genome-wide coverage and abundant disease risk SNPs.Journal of biochemistry · 2021Article
- Biobanking of human gut organoids for translational research.Experimental & molecular medicine · 2021Review
- Biosafety and biobanking: Current understanding and knowledge gaps.Biosafety and health · 2021Article
- jMorp updates in 2020: large enhancement of multi-omics data resources on the general Japanese population.Nucleic acids research · 2021Article
- Medical Sports Data Privacy Protection Method Based on Legal Risk Control.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2021Article
- Novel candidates of pathogenic variants of the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes from a dataset of 3,552 Japanese whole genomes (3.5KJPNv2).PloS one · 2021Article
- Biobanks-A Platform for Scientific and Biomedical Research.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- Contribution of Rare Variants of theGenetics · 2020Article
- Oral Microbiome Analysis in Prospective Genome Cohort Studies of the Tohoku Medical Megabank Project.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020Article
- The current state of omics technologies in the clinical management of asthma and allergic diseases.Annals of allergy, asthma & immunology : official publication of the American College of Allergy, Asthma, & Immunology · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWith the goal of realizing genome-based personalized healthcare, we have developed a biobank that integrates personal health, genome, and omics data along with biospecimens donated by volunteers of 150,000. Such a large-scale of data integration involves obvious risks of privacy violation. The research use of personal genome and health information is a topic of global discussion with regard to the protection of privacy while promoting scientific advancement. The present paper reports on our plans, current attempts, and accomplishments in addressing security problems involved in data sharing to ensure donor privacy while promoting scientific advancement.
methodsBiospecimens and data have been collected in prospective cohort studies with the comprehensive agreement. The sample size of 150,000 participants was required for multiple researches including genome-wide screening of gene by environment interactions, haplotype phasing, and parametric linkage analysis.
resultsWe established the T ohoku M edical M egabank (TMM) data sharing policy: a privacy protection rule that requires physical, personnel, and technological safeguards against privacy violation regarding the use and sharing of data. The proposed policy refers to that of NCBI and that of the Sanger Institute. The proposed policy classifies shared data according to the strength of re-identification risks. Local committees organized by TMM evaluate re-identification risk and assign a security category to a dataset. Every dataset is stored in an assigned segment of a supercomputer in accordance with its security category. A security manager should be designated to handle all security problems at individual data use locations. The proposed policy requires closed networks and IP-VPN remote connections.
conclusionThe mission of the biobank is to distribute biological resources most productively. This mission motivated us to collect biospecimens and health data and simultaneously analyze genome/omics data in-house. The biobank also has the mission of improving the quality and quantity of the contents of the biobank. This motivated us to request users to share the results of their research as feedback to the biobank. The TMM data sharing policy has tackled every security problem originating with the missions. We believe our current implementation to be the best way to protect privacy in data sharing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.