ArticleGenetics, selection, evolution : GSE2017
Putative enhancer sites in the bovine genome are enriched with variants affecting complex traits.
Article in Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Understanding super enhancers in genome architecture and their roles in livestock breeding.BMC genomics · 2026Review
- Selective sweeps for mutations increasing height impede identification of causative mutations for fertility and other correlated traits in cattle.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2025Article
- Comprehensive Multi-omics Analysis of Regulatory Variants for Body Weight in Cattle.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2025Article
- Investigating the Causal Effects of Exercise-Induced Genes on Sarcopenia.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- DNA methylation analysis to differentiate reference, breed, and parent-of-origin effects in the bovine pangenome era.GigaScience · 2024Article
- Genetic variation in histone modifications and gene expression identifies regulatory variants in the mammary gland of cattle.BMC genomics · 2022Article
- Transcriptional atlas analysis from multiple tissues reveals the expression specificity patterns in beef cattle.BMC biology · 2022Article
- Putative Causal Variants Are Enriched in Annotated Functional Regions From Six Bovine Tissues.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Comparative Enhancer Map of Cattle Muscle Genome Annotated by ATAC-Seq.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2021Article
- Genome-Wide Histone Modifications and CTCF Enrichment Predict Gene Expression in Sheep Macrophages.Frontiers in genetics · 2020Article
- Functionally Annotating Regulatory Elements in the Equine Genome Using Histone Mark ChIP-Seq.Genes · 2019Article
- Putative bovine topological association domains and CTCF binding motifs can reduce the search space for causative regulatory variants of complex traits.BMC genomics · 2018Article
- Mammalian genomic regulatory regions predicted by utilizing human genomics, transcriptomics, and epigenetics data.GigaScience · 2018Article
- Genome Wide Identification of Novel Long Non-coding RNAs and Their Potential Associations With Milk Proteins in Chinese Holstein Cows.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEnhancers are non-coding DNA sequences, which when they are bound by specific proteins increase the level of gene transcription. Enhancers activate unique gene expression patterns within cells of different types or under different conditions. Enhancers are key contributors to gene regulation, and causative variants that affect quantitative traits in humans and mice have been located in enhancer regions. However, in the bovine genome, enhancers as well as other regulatory elements are not yet well defined. In this paper, we sought to improve the annotation of bovine enhancer regions by using publicly available mammalian enhancer information. To test if the identified putative bovine enhancer regions are enriched with functional variants that affect milk production traits, we performed genome-wide association studies using imputed whole-genome sequence data followed by meta-analysis and enrichment analysis.
resultsWe produced a library of candidate bovine enhancer regions by using publicly available bovine ChIP-Seq enhancer data in combination with enhancer data that were identified based on sequence homology with human and mouse enhancer databases. We found that imputed whole-genome sequence variants associated with milk production traits in 16,581 dairy cattle were enriched with enhancer regions that were marked by bovine-liver H3K4me3 and H3K27ac histone modifications from both permutation tests and gene set enrichment analysis. Enhancer regions that were identified based on sequence homology with human and mouse enhancer regions were not as strongly enriched with trait-associated sequence variants as the bovine ChIP-Seq candidate enhancer regions. The bovine ChIP-Seq enriched enhancer regions were located near genes and quantitative trait loci that are associated with pregnancy, growth, disease resistance, meat quality and quantity, and milk quality and quantity traits in dairy and beef cattle.
conclusionsOur results suggest that sequence variants within enhancer regions that are located in bovine non-coding genomic regions contribute to the variation in complex traits. The level of enrichment was higher in bovine-specific enhancer regions that were identified by detecting histone modifications H3K4me3 and H3K27ac in bovine liver tissues than in enhancer regions identified by sequence homology with human and mouse data. These results highlight the need to use bovine-specific experimental data for the identification of enhancer regions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.