Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28683690›Full record

ArticleTissue engineering. Part A2018

Using Costal Chondrocytes to Engineer Articular Cartilage with Applications of Passive Axial Compression and Bioactive Stimuli.

Le W Huwe, Gurdeep K Sullan, Jerry C Hu, Kyriacos A Athanasiou

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Tissue engineering. Part A, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Mimicking Loading-Induced Cartilage Self-HeatingACS biomaterials science & engineering · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The functionality and translatability of neocartilage constructs are improved with the combination of fluid-induced shear stress and bioactive factors.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Le W Huwe1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California , Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California.
Gurdeep K Sullan1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California , Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California.
Jerry C Hu1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California , Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California.
Kyriacos A Athanasiou1 Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of California , Davis, One Shields Avenue, Davis, California.
University of California System · US

Funding

Self-assembling process in tissue engineering of articular cartilageR01AR067821 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA-IRVINE · PI ATHANASIOU, KYRIACOS A · 2015 to 2019
$1.9M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR067821
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generating neocartilage with suitable mechanical integrity from a cell source that can circumvent chondrocyte scarcity is indispensable for articular cartilage regeneration strategies. Costal chondrocytes of the rib eliminate donor site morbidity in the articular joint, but it remains unclear how neocartilage formed from these cells responds to mechanical loading, especially if the intent is to use it in a load-bearing joint. In a series of three experiments, this study sought to determine efficacious parameters of passive axial compressive stimulation that would enable costal chondrocytes to synthesize mechanically robust cartilage. Experiment 1 determined a suitable time window for stimulation by its application during either the matrix synthesis phase, the maturation phase, or during both phases of the self-assembling process. The results showed that compressive stimulation at either time was effective in increasing instantaneous moduli by 92% and 87% in the synthesis and maturation phases, respectively. Compressive stimulation during both phases did not further improve properties beyond a one-time stimulation. The magnitude of passive axial compression was examined in Experiment 2 by applying 0, 3.3, 5.0, or 6.7 kPa stresses to the neocartilage. Unlike 6.7 kPa, both 3.3 and 5.0 kPa significantly increased neocartilage compressive properties by 42% and 48% over untreated controls, respectively. Experiment 3 examined how the passive axial compression regimen developed from the previous phases interacted with a bioactive regimen (transforming growth factor [TGF]-β1, chondroitinase ABC, and lysyl oxidase-like 2). Passive axial compression significantly improved the relaxation modulus compared with bioactive treatment alone. Furthermore, a combined treatment of compressive and bioactive stimulation improved the tensile properties of neocartilage 2.6-fold compared with untreated control. The ability to create robust articular cartilage from passaged costal chondrocytes through appropriate mechanical and bioactive stimuli will greatly extend the clinical applicability of tissue-engineered products to a wider patient population.

Indexed as

AnimalsCartilage, ArticularChondrocytesCompressive StrengthPressureSheepTissue Engineeringarticular cartilagebioactivecostal chondrocytepassive axial compressionstimulation magnitudestimulation time window

Identifiers

PMID28683690
PMCPMC5833255
OpenAlexW2728916477

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.