Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28683472›Full record

ArticleBritish journal of cancer2017

Comprehensive analysis of copy number aberrations in microsatellite stable colon cancer in view of stromal component.

M Henar Alonso, Susanna Aussó, Adriana Lopez-Doriga, David Cordero, Elisabet Guinó, Xavier Solé, Mercè Barenys, Javier de Oca, Gabriel Capella, Ramón Salazar and 2 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in British journal of cancer, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 96 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
96citing papers in PubMed
17.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

96 citing papers in PubMed, 168 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M Henar AlonsoUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), CIBERESP, Gran Via 199, Hospitalet Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Susanna AussóUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), CIBERESP, Gran Via 199, Hospitalet Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Adriana Lopez-DorigaUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), CIBERESP, Gran Via 199, Hospitalet Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
David CorderoUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), CIBERESP, Gran Via 199, Hospitalet Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Elisabet GuinóUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), CIBERESP, Gran Via 199, Hospitalet Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier SoléUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), CIBERESP, Gran Via 199, Hospitalet Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Mercè BarenysMolecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy Cancer Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Javier de OcaMolecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy Cancer Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Gabriel CapellaMolecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy Cancer Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Ramón SalazarMolecular Mechanisms and Experimental Therapy Cancer Program, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain.
Rebeca Sanz-PamplonaUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), CIBERESP, Gran Via 199, Hospitalet Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Victor MorenoUnit of Biomarkers and Susceptibility, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), CIBERESP, Gran Via 199, Hospitalet Llobregat, 08908 Barcelona, Spain.
Institut d'Investigació Biomédica de Bellvitge · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESHospital de Viladecans · ESInstitut Català d'Ornitologia · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSomatic copy number aberrations (CNAs) are common acquired changes in cancer cells having an important role in the progression of colon cancer (colorectal cancer, CRC). This study aimed to perform a characterisation of CNA and their impact in gene expression.

methodsCopy number aberrations were inferred from SNP array data in a series of 99 CRC. Copy number aberration events were calculated and used to assess the association between copy number dosage, clinical and molecular characteristics of the tumours, and gene expression changes. All analyses were adjusted for the quantity of stroma in each sample, which was inferred from gene expression data.

resultsHigh heterogeneity among samples was observed; the proportion of altered genome ranged between 0.04 and 26.6%. Recurrent CNA regions with gains were frequent in chromosomes 7p, 8q, 13q, and 20, whereas 8p, 17p, and 18 cumulated losses. A significant positive correlation was observed between the number of somatic mutations and total CNA (Spearman's r=0.42, P=0.006). Approximately 37% of genes located in CNA regions changed their level of expression and the average partial correlation (adjusted for stromal content) with copy number was 0.54 (interquartile range 0.20 to 0.81). Altered genes showed enrichment in pathways relevant for CRC. Tumours classified as CMS2 and CMS4 by the consensus molecular subtyping showed higher frequency of CNA. Losses of one small region in 1p36.33, with gene CDK11B, were associated with poor prognosis. More than 66% of the recurrent CNA were validated in the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data when analysed with the same procedure. Furthermore, 79% of the genes with altered expression in our data were validated in the TCGA.

conclusionsAlthough CNA are frequent events in microsatellite stable CRC, few focal recurrent regions were found. These aberrations have strong effects on gene expression and contribute to deregulate relevant cancer pathways. Owing to the diploid nature of stromal cells, it is important to consider the purity of tumour samples to accurately calculate CNA events in CRC.

Indexed as

Chromosomes, HumanGene DosageGene ExpressionMicrosatellite RepeatsAgedColonColonic NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMaleMutation

Identifiers

PMID28683472
PMCPMC5537504
OpenAlexW2734220714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.