Observational studyMedicine2017
Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy.
Observational study in Medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.
- One in three adenomas could be missed by white-light colonoscopy - findings from a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Pooled it
- Comparison of adenoma detection rate between three-dimensional and standard colonoscopy: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.Endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Evaluating Intermittent Dosing of Aspirin for Colorectal Cancer Chemoprevention.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2025Trial
- Comparing right colon adenoma detection rate during water exchange and air insufflation: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.Techniques in coloproctology · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Gastrointestinal polyp detection method based on the improved RT-DETR.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Hierarchical contextual information aggregation for polyp segmentation.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A screening model for advanced colorectal neoplasia based on tumor markers and inflammatory indices: a retrospective study with an online risk calculator.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
- InCoLoTransNet: An Involution-Convolution and Locality Attention-Aware Transformer for Precise Colorectal Polyp Segmentation in GI Images.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2025Article
- Dietary pattern and lifestyle risk factors for sessile serrated precursors to colorectal cancer.The British journal of nutrition · 2025Article
- An Additional 30-s Observation of the Right-Sided Colon Using a Novel Endoscopic System with Texture and Color Enhancement Imaging Decreases Polyp Miss Rates: A Multicenter Study.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Improvement in Adenoma Detection Rate with Distal Attachment Device Endo-Wing™-Assisted Colonoscopy: A Randomized Control Trial.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Health anxiety and work loss in patients diagnosed with serrated polyposis syndrome: A cross sectional study.World journal of clinical oncology · 2025Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence for the Detection and Management of Colorectal Cancer Treatment.Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.) · 2024Review
- Article
- Enhanced accuracy with Segmentation of Colorectal Polyp using NanoNetB, and Conditional Random Field Test-Time Augmentation.Frontiers in robotics and AI · 2024Article
- Epidemiology and early screening strategies for colorectal cancer in China.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2023Article
- The Non-Invasive Prediction of Colorectal Neoplasia (NIPCON) Study 1995-2022: A Comparison of Guaiac-Based Fecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT) and an Anti-Adenoma Antibody, Adnab-9.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Near-Infrared Imaging of Colonic Adenomas In Vivo Using Orthotopic Human Organoids for Early Cancer Detection.Cancers · 2023Article
- Frequency of serrated polyposis syndrome recognition by community endoscopists.Endoscopy international open · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Several studies have reported a significant rate of missed colorectal polyps during colonoscopy. This study aimed to determine the variables that affect the miss rate of colorectal polyps.We performed a retrospective observational study of patients who, between January 2007 and December 2014, had undergone a second colonoscopy within 6 months of their first. In all patients, the first colonoscopy constituted a screening or surveillance colonoscopy as part of a health check-up, and the patients were referred to the endoscopic clinic if there were meaningful polyps. The miss rate of colorectal polyps was evaluated, as were the variables related to these missed lesions.Among 659 patients (535 men), the miss rate of colorectal polyps was 17.24% (372/2158 polyps), and 38.69% of patients (255/659 patients) had at least 1 missed polyp. The most common site for missed polyps was the ascending colon (29.8%), followed by the sigmoid colon (27.8%). The miss rate of polyps was higher in men [odds ratio (OR) = 1.611, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 1.024-2.536], patients with multiple polyps at their first colonoscopy (OR = 1.463, 95% CI = 0.992-2.157), and patients who had a history of polyps (OR = 23.783, 95% CI = 3.079-183.694). Multiple missed polyps were more frequently located in the right colon (OR = 2.605, 95% CI = 1.458-4.657), and the risk of sessile serrated adenoma/polyp was greater in the right colon (OR = 10.418, 95% CI = 2.073-52.353).Endoscopists should pay careful attention in patients who have multiple polyps and in those who have a history of polyps, because such patients are at a high risk of missed polyps in colonoscopy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.