Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28682844›Full record

ArticleClinical nuclear medicine2017

Whole-Body 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI Versus 68Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Prospective Study in 28 Patients.

Dominik Berzaczy, Chiara Giraudo, Alexander R Haug, Markus Raderer, Daniela Senn, Georgios Karanikas, Michael Weber, Marius E Mayerhoefer

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical nuclear medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 63 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PET/MR Imaging of the Gastrointestinal Tract.Magnetic resonance imaging clinics of North America · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. La Radiologia medica · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Comparison ofCurrent oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2024
    Article
  8. PET/MRI imaging in neuroendocrine neoplasm.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2023
    Review
  9. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis ofAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Same-day comparative protocol PET/CT-PET/MRI [Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2023
    Article
  13. Review
  14. PET/CT and PET/MRI in neuroendocrine neoplasms.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022
    Review
  15. Functional Imaging of Neuroendocrine Tumors: Stacking the Odds in a Patient's Favor.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Dominik BerzaczyFrom the Divisions of *General and Pediatric Radiology and †Nuclear Medicine, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy, and ‡Department of Internal Medicine I, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Chiara Giraudo
Alexander R Haug
Markus Raderer
Daniela Senn
Georgios Karanikas
Michael Weber
Marius E Mayerhoefer
Medical University of Vienna · ATActive Medicine (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic performance of simultaneous whole-body Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI compared with Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for detection of distant metastatic disease in patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs).

methodsPatients with histologically proven, well-differentiated NET (G1 or G2) were included in this prospective, institutional review board-approved study. Patients underwent Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT and subsequent Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI after a single tracer injection on the same day for staging or restaging purposes. Images were evaluated for the presence of NET lesions by 2 rater teams, each consisting of a nuclear medicine physician and a radiologist, in an observer-blinded fashion. Overall agreement, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, relative to a composite reference standard (consensus review including follow-up data), were calculated.

resultsBetween July 2014 and June 2016, 28 patients were enrolled. Overall agreement and accuracy between the 2 rater teams were 91.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.5%-95.9%) and 97% (95% CI, 94.4%-99.6%) for PET/MRI and 92.3% (95% CI, 88.3%-96.3%) and 94.6% (95% CI, 91.2%-98.1%) for PET/CT, respectively (P = 1.00).Overall, PET/MRI reached 89.8% sensitivity (95% CI, 77.8%-96.6%) and 100% specificity (95% CI, 97%-100%); PET/CT showed 81.6% sensitivity (95% CI, 68%-91.2%) and 100% specificity (95% CI, 97%-100%) for the detection of metastatic disease in NETs.

conclusionsWhole-body Ga-DOTANOC PET/MRI appears to be comparable to Ga-DOTANOC PET/CT for lesion detection in patients with well-differentiated NETs.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingOrganometallic CompoundsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyWhole Body ImagingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisNeuroendocrine TumorsProspective Studies68Ga-DOTANOCOrganometallic Compounds

Identifiers

PMID28682844
PMCPMC5636054
OpenAlexW2724221442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.