Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28682798›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2017

Accommodation and related conditions in vascularized composite allografts.

Jeffrey L Platt, Christina L Kaufman, Mayara Garcia de Mattos Barbosa, Marilia Cascalho

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The five dimensions of B cell tolerance.Immunological reviews · 2019
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jeffrey L PlattaDepartment of Surgery bDepartment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan cChristine M. Kleinert Institute for Hand and Microsurgery, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Christina L Kaufman
Mayara Garcia de Mattos Barbosa
Marilia Cascalho
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USChristine M. Kleinert Institute · US

Funding

Engineering an immuno-isolating hydrogel for restoring ovarian endocrine functionR01EB022033 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SHIKANOV, ARIELLA · 2016 to 2019
$1.5M
Accommodation in TransplantationR56AI123262 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI CASCALHO, MARILIA ISABEL, PLATT, JEFFREY L · 2016 to 2016
$388k
NIAID NIH HHS R56 AI123262NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB022033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe outcome of vascularized composite allografts (VCA) often appear unrelated to the presence of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in blood of the recipient or deposition of complement in the graft. The attenuation of injury and the absence of rejection in other types of grafts despite manifest donor-specific immunity have been explained by accommodation (acquired resistance to immune-mediated injury), adaptation (loss of graft antigen) and/or enhancement (antibody-mediated antigen blockade). Whether and how accommodation, adaptation and/or enhancement impact on the outcome of VCA is unknown. Here we consider how recent observations concerning accommodation in organ transplants might advance understanding and resolve uncertainties about the clinical course of VCA. RECENT

findingsInvestigation of the mechanisms through which kidney allografts avert antibody-mediated injury and rejection provide insights potentially applicable to VCA. Interaction of DSA can facilitate replacement of donor by recipient endothelial cells, modulate or decrease synthesis of antigen, mobilize antigen that in turn blocks further immune recognition and limit the amount of bound antibody, allowing accommodation to ensue. These processes also can explain the apparent dissociation between the presence and levels of DSA in blood, deposition of C4d in grafts and antibody-mediated rejection. Over time the processes might also explain the inception of chronic graft changes. SUMMARY: The disrupted tissue in VCA and potential for repopulation by endothelial cells of the recipient establish conditions that potentially decrease susceptibility to acute antibody-mediated rejection. These conditions include clonal suppression of donor-specific B cells, and adaptation, enhancement and accommodation. This setting also potentially highlights heretofore unrecognized interactions between these 'protective' processes.

Indexed as

Composite Tissue AllograftsGraft RejectionHumans

Identifiers

PMID28682798
PMCPMC5648361
OpenAlexW2733252114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.