Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28682456›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Geriatrics Society2017

How Hospital Clinicians Select Patients for Skilled Nursing Facilities.

Robert E Burke, Emily Lawrence, Amy Ladebue, Roman Ayele, Brandi Lippmann, Ethan Cumbler, Rebecca Allyn, Jacqueline Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Life-space mobility and healthcare costs and utilization in older men.Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Mapping the care transition from hospital to skilled nursing facility.Journal of evaluation in clinical practice · 2020
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Robert E BurkeDenver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
Emily LawrenceDenver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
Amy LadebueDenver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
Roman AyeleDenver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
Brandi LippmannDenver-Seattle Center of Innovation, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, Colorado.
Ethan CumblerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.
Rebecca AllynDepartment of Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado.
Jacqueline JonesCollege of Nursing, University of Colorado, Aurora, Colorado.

Funding

Improving the outcomes of older adults discharged to post-acute care facilities after hospitalizationR03AG050885 · NIA · DENVER RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI BURKE, ROBERT EDWARD · 2015 to 2016
$171k
HSRD VA IK2 HX001796NIA NIH HHS R03 AG050885
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo understand how hospital-based clinicians evaluate older adults in the hospital and decide who will be transferred to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) for postacute care.

designSemistructured interviews paired with a qualitative analytical approach informed by Social Constructivist theory.

settingInpatient care units in three hospitals. Purposive sampling was used to maximize variability in hospitals, units within hospitals, and staff on those units.

participantsClinicians (hospitalists, nurses, therapists, social workers, case managers) involved in evaluation and decision-making regarding postacute care (N = 25). MEASUREMENTS: Central themes related to clinician evaluation and discharge decision-making.

resultsClinicians described pressure to expedite evaluation and discharge decisions, resulting in the use of SNFs as a "safety net" for older adults being discharged from the hospital. The lack of hospital-based clinician knowledge of SNF care practices, quality, or patient outcomes resulted in lack of a standardized evaluation process or a clear primary decision-maker.

conclusionHospital clinician evaluation and decision-making about postacute care in SNFs may be characterized as rushed, without a clear system or framework for making decisions and uninformed by knowledge of SNF or patient outcomes in those discharged to SNFs. This leads to SNFs being used as a "safety net" for many older adults. As hospitals and SNFs are increasingly held jointly accountable for outcomes of individuals transitioning between hospitals and SNFs, novel solutions for improving evaluation and decision-making are urgently needed.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelSkilled Nursing FacilitiesAgedAged, 80 and overClinical CompetenceDisability EvaluationFemaleHospitalistsHumansMalePatient Care ManagementPatient TransferQuality ImprovementUnited Statesdecision-makinghospitalizationpostacute care

Identifiers

PMID28682456
PMCPMC5681432

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.