Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28682317›Full record

ArticleJournal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association2017

A management strategy that reduces NICU admissions and decreases charges from the front line of the neonatal abstinence syndrome epidemic.

S Loudin, J Werthammer, L Prunty, S Murray, J I Shapiro, T H Davies

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Non-pharmacological care for opioid withdrawal in newborns.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Gender Differences in Withdrawing Infants.Global pediatric health · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S LoudinDepartment of Pediatrics, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
J WerthammerDepartment of Pediatrics, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
L PruntyDepartment of Pharmacy Practice, Administration, and Research, Marshall University School of Pharmacy, Huntington, WV, USA.
S MurrayNeonatal Therapeutic Unit, Cabell Huntington Hospital, Huntington, WV, USA.
J I ShapiroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
T H DaviesDepartment of Clinical and Translational Science, Joan C Edwards School of Medicine at Marshall University, Huntington, WV, USA.
Marshall University · USCabell Huntington Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe purpose of this study was to test a specialized needs-based management model for a high volume of babies born with neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) while controlling costs and reducing neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) bed usage. STUDY

designData were analyzed from inborn neonates >35 weeks' gestational age with the diagnosis of NAS (ICD9-CM 779.5), requiring pharmacologic treatment and discharged from 2010 through 2015. Significance was determined using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney as well as χ

resultsNAS requiring medication treatment increased from 34.1 per 1000 live births in 2010 to 94.3 per 1000 live births in 2015 (P<0.0001 for trend). Hospital charges were significantly different in the three described locations (P<0.0001). Median per patient hospital charges for medically treated NAS were $90 601 (interquartile range (IQR) $64 489 to $128 135) for NAS patients managed in the NICU, $68 750 (IQR $44 952 to $92 548) for those managed in an in-hospital dedicated unit and $17 688 (IQR $9933 to $20 033) for those cared for in an outpatient neonatal withdrawal center. NICU admission was avoided in 78% of the population once both alternative locations were fully implemented.

conclusionsIn this cohort of infants, a 219% increase in the number of infants treated for NAS overwhelmed the capacity of our traditional resources. There was a need to develop new treatment approaches dealing with the NAS crisis and a growing population of prenatally exposed babies. We found that the described model of care significantly reduced charges and stabilized admissions to our NICU despite the marked increase in cases. Without this system, our NICU would be in a critical state of gridlock and diversion; instead, we have efficient management of a large NAS population.

Indexed as

Hospital ChargesHumansInfant, NewbornIntensive Care Units, NeonatalLength of StayLongitudinal StudiesNeonatal Abstinence SyndromePatient AdmissionStatistics, Nonparametric

Identifiers

PMID28682317
PMCPMC5633652
OpenAlexW2731662457

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.