Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28682186›Full record

Trial reportBehavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.)

Health-Promotion Intervention Increases Self-Reported Physical Activity in Sub-Saharan African University Students: A Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.

G Anita Heeren, John B Jemmott, C Show Marange, Arnold Rumosa Gwaze, Jesca Mercy Batidzirai, Zolani Ngwane, Andrew Mandeya, Joanne C Tyler

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Behavioral medicine (Washington, D.C.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Waist-based anthropometric measures and central adiposity-related comorbidities in children.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Physical activity and sedentary behaviour of primary school learners in the Eastern Cape province of South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

G Anita Heerena St. Joseph's University , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7376-1132
John B Jemmotta St. Joseph's University , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
C Show Marangeb University of Fort Hare , Alice , South Africa.
Arnold Rumosa Gwazeb University of Fort Hare , Alice , South Africa.
Jesca Mercy Batidziraib University of Fort Hare , Alice , South Africa.
Zolani Ngwaned Haverford College , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Andrew Mandeyad Haverford College , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Joanne C Tylerd Haverford College , Philadelphia , Pennsylvania , USA.
Haverford College · USUniversity of Fort Hare · ZASaint Joseph's University · US

Funding

Health Promotion for South African University StudentsR34MH078803 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI HEEREN, GUDRUN ANITA · 2008 to 2010
$631k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH078803
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To evaluate the efficacy of a health-promotion intervention in increasing self-reported physical activity among university students in Sub-Saharan Africa. Randomly selected second-year students at a university in South Africa were randomized to an intervention based on social cognitive theory: health-promotion, targeting physical activity and fruit, vegetable, and fat consumption; or HIV risk-reduction, targeting sexual-risk behaviors. Participants completed assessments via audio computer-assisted self-interviewing pre-intervention and 6 and 12 months post-intervention. A total of 176 were randomized with 171 (97.2%) retained 12 months post-intervention. Generalized-estimating-equations analyses indicated that the health-promotion-intervention participants were more likely to meet physical-activity guidelines than were control participants, post-intervention, adjusting for pre-intervention physical activity (odds ratio [OR] = 3.35; 95% CI: 1.33-8.41). Health-promotion participants reported a greater number of days they did vigorous-intensity (risk ratio [RR] = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.43-2.83) and moderate-intensity (RR = 1.40; 95% CI: 1.01-1.95) aerobic activity, but not strength-building activity (RR = 1.37; 95% CI: 0.091-2.07). The intervention reduced self-reported servings of fried foods (mean difference = -0.31; 95% CI: -0.60, -0.02). The findings suggest that theory-based, contextually appropriate interventions may increase physical activity among university students in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Indexed as

Self ReportUniversitiesAfrica South of the SaharaExerciseFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMalePilot ProjectsStudentsYoung Adult5-a-Day diethealth-promotion interventionphysical activityrandomized controlled trialsocial cognitive theorySub-Saharan Africauniversity students

Identifiers

PMID28682186
PMCPMC6292207
OpenAlexW2728767435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.