ArticleKorean journal of ophthalmology : KJO2017
Comparison of Long-term Surgical Outcomes of Two-muscle Surgery in Basic-type Intermittent Exotropia: Bilateral versus Unilateral.
Article in Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Contrast Agent and Molecular Imaging Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Intelligent Image Sensor Combined with Visual Training in the Treatment of Children with Intermittent Exotropia in China.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2022Pooled it
- Sensory outcome of exotropia surgery in Thailand: a retrospective multicenter study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Long-term Outcomes of Bilateral Lateral Rectus Recession Using a Modified Normogram for Targeting Small Overcorrection in Intermittent Exotropia.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2024Article
- How to Better Treat Patients with Intermittent Exotropia: A Review of Surgical Treatment of Intermittent Exotropia.Korean journal of ophthalmology : KJO · 2022Review
- Analysis of the Changes and Possible Reasons in Aberrations before and after Surgery in Patients with Concomitant Exotropia.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare long-term surgical outcomes after bilateral lateral rectus recession (BLR) and unilateral lateral rectus recession-medial rectus resection (RR) for the treatment of basic-type intermittent exotropia.
methodsConsecutive patients who underwent BLR or RR for treatment of intermittent exotropia between 1999 and 2010 and underwent ≥5 years of follow-up were recruited for this study. Surgical outcomes were grouped according to postoperative angle of deviation: overcorrection (esophoria/tropia >8 prism diopters [Δ]), success (esophoria/tropia ≤8Δ to exophoria/tropia ≤8Δ), and undercorrection/recurrence (exophoria/tropia >8Δ). Outcomes were compared between the BLR group and the RR group at postoperative week 1, months 1 and 6, and years 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
resultsOf 99 patients, 37 underwent BLR and 62 underwent RR. At postoperative month 6 (97.3% vs. 82.3%, p = 0.045) and year 1 (91.9% vs. 74.2%, p = 0.040), the surgical success rates in the BLR group were significantly higher than in the RR group. Recurrence of exophoria/tropia most commonly occurred between 2 and 3 years after surgery in the BLR group, but continuous recurrences were found in the RR group. At postoperative year 5, the surgical success rate was 54.1% in the BLR group and 41.9% in the RR group (p = 0.403). The reoperation rate was 24.3% in the BLR group and 33.9% in the RR group (p = 0.317).
conclusionsSurgical outcomes 5 years after surgery for intermittent exotropia were comparable between the BLR and RR groups. The surgical success rate and the reoperation rate were not significantly different between the BLR and RR groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.