Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28681962›Full record

SynthesisThe British journal of surgery2017

Systematic review of management of chronic pain after surgery.

V Wylde, J Dennis, A D Beswick, J Bruce, C Eccleston, N Howells, T J Peters, R Gooberman-Hill

4 registry-linked trialsOpen access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The British journal of surgery, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 74 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03886259 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Neuromuscular Exercise in Combination With Pain Neuroscience Education Compared to Pain Neuroscience Education Alone in Patients With Chronic Pain After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorAalborg UniversityRan2019 to 2024Enrolled71ConditionsArthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Chronic PainArmsNeuromuscular exercises (NEMEX-TJR) and pain neuroscience education, Pain neuroscience education
NCT05718544 phase4completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Mini-dose Esketamine-dexmedetomidine Supplemented Analgesia on Long-term Outcomes Following Scoliosis Correction Surgery: 2-year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2023 to 2023Enrolled199ConditionsScoliosis Correction, Postoperative Analgesia, Esketamine, DexmedetomidineArmsEsketamine, Dexmedetomidine, Sufentanil
NCT06062550 phase4active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of Different Dose Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine Combination for Supplemental Analgesia After Scoliosis Correction Surgery: A Randomized, Double-blind Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2023 to 2026Enrolled312ConditionsScoliosis Correction, Esketamine, Dexmedetomidine, Postoperative AnalgesiaArmsEsketamine
NCT06087510 phase4recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Impact of Different Dose Esketamine and Dexmedetomidine Combination for Supplemental Analgesia on Long-term Outcomes After Scoliosis Correction Surgery: Follow-up of a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPeking University First HospitalRan2024 to 2026Enrolled312ConditionsScoliosis Correction, Postoperative Analgesia, Esketamine, DexmedetomidineArmsEsketamine
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

V WyldeMusculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8460-1529
J DennisMusculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
A D BeswickMusculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
J BruceWarwick Clinical Trials Unit, University of Warwick, Warwick, UK.
C EcclestonCentre for Pain Research, University of Bath, Bath, UK.
N HowellsAvon Orthopaedic Centre, Department of Trauma and Orthopaedics, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK.
T J PetersMusculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
R Gooberman-HillMusculoskeletal Research Unit, School of Clinical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBGhent University · BENorth Bristol NHS Trust · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health 13/89/29Department of Health RP-PG-0613-20001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPain present for at least 3 months after a surgical procedure is considered chronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) and affects 10-50 per cent of patients. Interventions for CPSP may focus on the underlying condition that indicated surgery, the aetiology of new-onset pain or be multifactorial in recognition of the diverse causes of this pain. The aim of this systematic review was to identify RCTs of interventions for the management of CPSP, and synthesize data across treatment type to estimate their effectiveness and safety.

methodsMEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2016. Trials of pain interventions received by patients at 3 months or more after surgery were included. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool.

resultsSome 66 trials with data from 3149 participants were included. Most trials included patients with chronic pain after spinal surgery (25 trials) or phantom limb pain (21 trials). Interventions were predominantly pharmacological, including antiepileptics, capsaicin, epidural steroid injections, local anaesthetic, neurotoxins, N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor antagonists and opioids. Other interventions included acupuncture, exercise, postamputation limb liner, spinal cord stimulation, further surgery, laser therapy, magnetic stimulation, mindfulness-based stress reduction, mirror therapy and sensory discrimination training. Opportunities for meta-analysis were limited by heterogeneity. For all interventions, there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions on effectiveness.

conclusionThere is a need for more evidence about interventions for CPSP. High-quality trials of multimodal interventions matched to pain characteristics are needed to provide robust evidence to guide management of CPSP.

Indexed as

Acupuncture TherapyBehavior TherapyChronic PainCombined Modality TherapyExercise TherapyHumansLaser TherapyPostoperative PainSpinal Cord Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID28681962
PMCPMC5599964
OpenAlexW2726943764

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.