ArticleHistochemistry and cell biology2017
Cell cycle analysis in the rat external granular layer evaluated by several bromodeoxyuridine immunoperoxidase staining protocols.
Article in Histochemistry and cell biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- 5-Bromo-2'-deoxyuridine labeling: historical perspectives, factors influencing the detection, toxicity, and its implications in the neurogenesis.Neural regeneration research · 2024Review
- Review
- Review
- An immunocytochemical approach to the analysis of the cell division cycle in the rat cerebellar neuroepithelium.Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.) · 2020Article
- Drp1 is widely, yet heterogeneously, distributed in the mouse central nervous system.Molecular brain · 2020Article
- In focus in HCB.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An important step in bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) immunohistochemistry is the production of single-stranded DNA to make the incorporated BrdU accessible to the antibodies. This paper examines the effect of distinct DNA denaturation pretreatments (DNase I, sodium citrate buffer, endonuclease Eco RI and exonuclease III, and HCl hydrolysis) on detection of BrdU. We found that all the methods used in the partial denaturation of DNA combined good nuclear immunostaining with acceptable tissue integrity. We also observed that these immunohistochemical protocols revealed a spatial pattern in the distribution of DNA-synthesizing cells within the cerebellar external granular layer (EGL) of 10-day-old rats, allowing us to estimate the fraction of S-phase cells. Our results indicate that detection of BrdU-stained cells is affected by the distinct histological procedures used in such detection. Additionally, as the duration and phases of the cell cycle in EGL neuroblasts are estimated in accordance with BrdU detection, an effect on this detection can render the measurement of cell cycle inaccurate. The present work shows that DNase I and citrate buffer, at appropriate conditions, may be good alternatives for acid denaturation. However, they are less sensitive than autoradiographic techniques that use
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.