Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28681261›Full record

ArticleObesity surgery2018

Laparoscopic Ileal Interposition with Diverted Sleeve Gastrectomy Versus Laparoscopic Transit Bipartition with Sleeve Gastrectomy for Better Glycemic Outcomes in T2DM Patients.

Serdar Yormaz, Huseyin Yılmaz, Ilhan Ece, Mustafa Sahin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Obesity surgery, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Glycemic Control in Obese Type 2 Diabetic Patients Treated with Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy and Transit Bipartition.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Serdar YormazDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Polikliniği, 42075, Konya, Turkey. serdaryormaz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6273-3643
Huseyin YılmazDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Polikliniği, 42075, Konya, Turkey.
Ilhan EceDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Polikliniği, 42075, Konya, Turkey.
Mustafa SahinDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Selcuk University Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Polikliniği, 42075, Konya, Turkey.
Selçuk University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMetabolic procedures provide better outcomes for obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Our aim was to compare the glycemic regulation in patients that have undergone the laparoscopic ileal interposition with diverted sleeve gastrectomy (II-DSG), laparoscopic transit bipartition with sleeve gastrectomy (TB-SG), and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) throughout a 12-month follow-up period retrospectively.

methodsThis study considered patients with T2DM who underwent metabolic procedures. The postoperative changes in the glucose, C-peptide, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, insulin, cholesterol, body mass index, and total weight loss (TWL) were compared retrospectively. The intended outcome was to reach a long lasting fasting blood glucose (FBG) <126 mg/dl. A multivariate regression analysis was applied to define the predictive markers in glucose regulation.

resultsPresent study consisted of 83 patients with a mean age of 47.25 ± 6.58 years, mean preoperative BMI of 37.36 ± 2.71 kg/m

conclusionOur results showed that II-DSG and TB-SG ensured significant regression rates during the follow-up period. Since the TB-SG achieved these outcomes by finite anastomoses and intervening segments, it was considered to be a superior procedure compared to II-DSG and LSG procedures.

Indexed as

AdultBlood GlucoseBody Mass IndexC-PeptideDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleGastrectomyHumansIleumInsulinLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedObesityPostoperative PeriodRetrospective StudiesBlood GlucoseC-PeptideInsulinBariatric surgeryDiverted sleeve gastrectomy with ileal transpositionGlycemic regulationSleeve gastrectomy with transit bipartitionType 2 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID28681261
OpenAlexW2733631856

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.