Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28681193›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2017

Bone SPECT/CT in the postoperative spine: a focus on spinal fusion.

Khulood Al-Riyami, Gopinath Gnanasegaran, Tim Van den Wyngaert, Jamshed Bomanji

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Khulood Al-RiyamiInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals, Tower 5, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Gopinath GnanasegaranDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
Tim Van den WyngaertDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Antwerp University Hospital, Edegem, Belgium.
Jamshed BomanjiInstitute of Nuclear Medicine, University College London Hospitals, Tower 5, 235 Euston Road, London, NW1 2BU, UK. jamshed.bomanji@nhs.net.
University College London · GBThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Low back pain is a global problem affecting one in 10 people. The management of low back pain varies from conservative to more invasive methods with a spectacular increase in the number of patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery during the last decade. Conventional radiological and radionuclide studies are often used in the assessment of persistent or recurring pain after spinal surgery with several advantages and limitations related to each technique. This article reviews the key contribution of integrated bone SPECT/CT in evaluating patients with persistent or recurring pain after spinal surgery, focusing on spinal fusion. Current literature supports the use of bone SPECT/CT as an adjunct imaging modality and problem-solving tool in evaluating patients with suspicion of pseudarthrosis, adjacent segment degeneration, and hardware failure. The role of bone SPECT/CT in post-operative orthopaedic scenarios is evolving, and this review highlights the need for further research on the role of bone SPECT/CT in these patients.

Indexed as

Spinal FusionHumansPostoperative PeriodSingle Photon Emission Computed Tomography Computed TomographySpineAdjacent segment diseaseBack painBoneComplicationsFusion instabilityHardware failureSPECT/CTSpinal fusion

Identifiers

PMID28681193
OpenAlexW2733943252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.