ArticleInternational urogynecology journal2018
Risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) at a tertiary centre in south India.
Article in International urogynecology journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- IUGA International Guidelines on Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Effects of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries (OASIS) on Incidence of Urinary and Anal Incontinence After Childbirth in Nigeria: A Prospective Cohort Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- Incidence and Risk Factors of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury at a Tertiary Care Hospital in Thailand: A 10-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.International urogynecology journal · 2026Article
- High Incidence of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries among Immigrant Women of Asian Ethnicity.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
- Knowledge, attitude and experience of episiotomy practice among obstetricians and midwives: a cross-sectional study from China.BMJ open · 2021Article
- Sonographic fetal head circumference and the risk of obstetric anal sphincter injury following vaginal delivery.International urogynecology journal · 2020Article
- Risk Factors for Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries among Women Delivering at a Tertiary Hospital in Southwestern Uganda.Obstetrics and gynecology international · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introduction and hypothesisDespite several studies that have reported risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI), data from the Indian subcontinent are scarce. The purpose of this study was to identify risk factors for these sphincter injuries in an Indian population.
methodsThis was a case-control study within a retrospective cohort of vaginal deliveries at a tertiary care facility. All vaginal births beyond 24 completed weeks of gestation and birth weight ≥500 g from January 2008 to December 2012 were identified from the hospital electronic database. Cases were women with OASI sustained during vaginal delivery; the rest constituted controls. Potential risk factors for occurrence and severity of OASI were assessed initially using bivariate analysis and then a logistic regression model.
resultsThe incidence of sphincter injury was 2.1% of vaginal births and 1.1% of all deliveries, and major-degree (3c and 4th-degree) tears constituted 20.9% of tears. After adjusted analysis, significant predictors for injury included primiparity, delivery at or beyond 41 weeks of gestation, epidural analgesia, instrumental delivery, shoulder dystocia, birth weight ≥4000 g, and head circumference ≥35 cm. Episiotomy protected against sphincter injuries, particularly in forceps and ventouse deliveries. Shoulder dystocia was significantly associated with major-degree tears, while episiotomy appeared to be protective.
conclusionRisk factors are similar to those in other population groups; however, primiparity appears to be associated with lesser risk and forceps delivery with greater risk of sphincter trauma than previously reported.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.