Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28681169›Full record

ArticleDemography2017

Influence of Proximity to Kin on Residential Mobility and Destination Choice: Examining Local Movers in Metropolitan Areas.

Amy Spring, Elizabeth Ackert, Kyle Crowder, Scott J South

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Demography, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
22.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Local Ties in the Social Networks of Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Amy SpringDepartment of Sociology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, 30302-5020, USA. aspring@gsu.edu.
Elizabeth AckertPopulation Research Center, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TX, 78712-1699, USA.
Kyle CrowderDepartment of Sociology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195-3340, USA.
Scott J SouthDepartment of Sociology, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, 12222, USA.
Albany State University · USGeorgia State University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

Family Dynamics, Fertility, and Investments in Children Across Generations - Administrative SupplementR01HD069609 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Thomas Fraser Crossley · 2011 to 2026
$14.2M
Methods and Data CoreR24HD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI TOLNAY, STEWART E · 2002 to 2016
$9.3M
Scientific/Technical CoreP2CHD042828 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SARA R. CURRAN · 2017 to 2026
$6.3M
Population Research TrainingT32HD007543 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CURRAN, SARA R. · 2002 to 2016
$2.3M
NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD042828NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069609NICHD NIH HHS R24 HD042828NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A growing body of research has examined how family dynamics shape residential mobility, highlighting the social-as opposed to economic-drivers of mobility. However, few studies have examined kin ties as both push and pull factors in mobility processes or revealed how the influence of kin ties on mobility varies across sociodemographic groups. Using data on local residential moves from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID) from 1980 to 2013, we find that location of noncoresident kin influences the likelihood of moving out of the current neighborhood and the selection of a new destination neighborhood. Analyses of out-mobility reveal that parents and young adult children living near each other as well as low-income adult children living near parents are especially deterred from moving. Discrete-choice models of neighborhood selection indicate that movers are particularly drawn to neighborhoods close to aging parents, white and higher-income households tend to move close to parents and children, and lower-income households tend to move close to extended family. Our results highlight the social and economic trade-offs that households face when making residential mobility decisions, which have important implications for broader patterns of inequality in residential attainment.

Indexed as

Choice BehaviorFamily RelationsAdultAgedAge FactorsHumansIncomeMiddle AgedPopulation DynamicsRacial GroupsResidence CharacteristicsSocioeconomic FactorsWhite PeopleDiscrete choiceFamily dynamicsNeighborhoodResidential mobility

Identifiers

PMID28681169
PMCPMC5734642
OpenAlexW2733051013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.