Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28681121›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2017

Indexes of cerebral autoregulation do not reflect impairment in syncope: insights from head-up tilt test of vasovagal and autonomic failure subjects.

Pedro Castro, João Freitas, Rosa Santos, Ronney Panerai, Elsa Azevedo

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Quantification of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: welcome to the jungle!Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Transfer function analysis of dynamic cerebral autoregulation: A CARNet white paper 2022 update.Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism · 2023
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Pedro CastroDepartment of Neurology, São João Hospital Center, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal. pedromacc@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1401-2398
João FreitasAutonomic Unit, São João Hospital Center, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Rosa SantosDepartment of Neurology, São João Hospital Center, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
Ronney PaneraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences and NIH Biomedical Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Elsa AzevedoDepartment of Neurology, São João Hospital Center, Faculty of Medicine of University of Porto, Alameda Professor Hernani Monteiro, 4200-319, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PTUniversity of Leicester · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe study of dynamic cerebral autoregulation (CA), which adapts cerebral blood flow to arterial blood pressure (ABP) fluctuations, has been limited in orthostatic intolerance syndromes, mainly due to its stationary prerequisites hardly to meet during maneuvers to provoke syncope itself. New techniques of continuous estimates of CA could overcome this pitfall. We aimed to evaluate CA during head-up tilt test in common conditions causing syncope.

methodsWe compared three groups: eight controls; eight patients with autonomic failure due to familial amyloidotic polyneuropathy; eight patients with vasovagal syncope (VVS). ABP and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) were measured with Finometer

resultsWith HUTT, AF subjects showed a pronounced decrease in CBFV (-36 ± 17 versus -7 ± 6%, p < 0.0001), ABP (-29 ± 27 versus 7 ± 12%, p < 0.0001) and RAP (-17 ± 23 versus 3 ± 18%, p < 0.0001) but not CVRi (p = 0.110). VVS subjects showed progressive cerebral vasoconstriction prior to syncope, (reduced CBFV 19 ± 15 versus 1 ± 6, p < 0.000; increased RAP 12 ± 18 versus 2 ± 3%, p = 0.024 and CVRi 12 ± 18 versus 2 ± 3%, p = 0.005). ARI(t) increased significantly in AF patients (5.7 ± 1.2 versus 6.9 ± 1.2, p = 0.040) and VVS (5.8 ± 1.2 versus 7.3 ± 1.2, p = 0.015) in response to ABP fall during syncope.

conclusionsOur data suggest that dynamic cerebral autoregulatory response to orthostatic challenge is neither affected by autonomic dysfunction nor in neutrally mediated syncope. This study also emphasizes that RAP + CrCP model is more informative than CVRi, mainly during cerebral vasodilatory response to orthostatic hypotension.

Indexed as

Cerebrovascular CirculationHomeostasisAdultAmyloid NeuropathiesBlood PressureCase-Control StudiesFemaleHumansMaleOrthostatic IntolerancePostureSyncope, VasovagalVagus NerveAutonomic nervous systemCerebral blood flowCerebral vasoreactivityHead-up tiltOrthostatic intoleranceSyncopeTranscranial Doppler

Identifiers

PMID28681121
OpenAlexW2730499544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.