ReviewZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2017
[Dual-energy computed tomography diagnostics for gout].
Review in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Gout Inflammation Time Programming: Molecular Clock from Crystal Triggering to Tissue Remodeling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- A Case of Spinal Infectious Osteomyelitis Versus Gout: Advanced Imaging with Dual Energy CT.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Spine Fractures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of spine surgery · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-invasive imaging modalities are used for the morphological and functional evaluation and diagnosis of gout; however, none of these methods are sufficiently sensitive or specific for the diagnosis of gout. By the use of dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) the direct visualization of sodium urate deposition is now possible. Moreover, it is possible to show the different pathological situations, disease activity and monitoring of tophaceous gout. The positive DECT scan became one of the 2015 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for gout 2 years ago. MATERIAL AND
methodsThe literature search from 2009-2017 in PubMed, with the search criteria "Dual Energy CT and Gout" revealed 77 publications on the DECT method.
resultsThe DECT technique has a high sensitivity (90-100%) and a high specificity (83-89%) for diagnosing gout. The development of a semiquantitative scoring method also enables measurement of the severity of urate deposits at specific sites. CONCUSION: The gold standard for the diagnosis of gout is still the detection of monosodium urate monohydrate crystals by polarizing microscopy after a joint punction; however with the DECT it is possible to non-invasively visualize, measure and score urate deposition and is therefore suitable for estimating the severity and prognosis. Although not clinical validated, DECT may sometimes help to detect gout. More studies should be conducted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.