Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28681040›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2017

The renoprotective effects of mannitol and udenafil in renal ischemia-reperfusion injury model.

Yusuf Özlülerden, Cihan Toktaş, Hülya Aybek, Vural Küçükatay, Nilay Şen Türk, Ali Ersin Zumrutbas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The efficiency of oxerutin on apoptosis and kidney function in rats with renal ischemia reperfusion injury.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2022
    Article
  3. Reno-protective effects of Phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors.Clinical and experimental nephrology · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yusuf ÖzlülerdenDenizli State Hospital, Urology Clinic, Denizli, Turkey.
Cihan ToktaşDepartment of Urology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.
Hülya AybekDepartment of Biochemistry, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.
Vural KüçükatayDepartment of Physiology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.
Nilay Şen TürkDepartment of Pathology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.
Ali Ersin ZumrutbasDepartment of Urology, Pamukkale University School of Medicine, Denizli, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study was to investigate and compare the effects of udenafil and mannitol in an experimental renal ischemia-reperfusion (I/R) injury model. MATERIALS AND

methodsA total of 64 female Wister Albino rats were used. Right nephrectomy was performed in all groups. In the control group; I/R injury was not performed. In the I/R group; left renal pedicle was clamped for 45 minutes and then underwent 60 minutes and 24 hours of reperfusion. In the mannitol group; 1 mL 20% mannitol was given intravenously 15 minutes before clamping. In the udenafil group; 10-mg/kg udenafil was given orally 1 hour before clamping. Creatinine (Cr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN), Cr clearance, malondialdehyde, neutrophil gelatinase associated lipocalin (NGAL), histological examination and DNA damage (Comet Assay method) levels were compared in tissue, serum and urine samples.

resultsUdenafil had a better protective effect than mannitol according to biochemical parameters (Cr, BUN, Cr clearance, and NGAL levels) and histopathological findings when compared with the I/R group. In the Comet sampling analysis no significant difference was detected.

conclusionsUdenafil has a better renoprotective effect than mannitol against I/R injury and this effect supports more functional improvements. Further clinical trials are needed to demonstrate those effects and clinical utility of udenafil for that purpose in humans.

Indexed as

Acute-Phase ProteinsAnimalsBenzenesulfonamidesConstrictionDiuretics, OsmoticFemaleKidneyLipocalin-2LipocalinsMalondialdehydeMannitolNephrectomyPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsProtective AgentsProto-Oncogene ProteinsPyrimidinesAcute-Phase ProteinsBenzenesulfonamidesDiuretics, OsmoticLcn2 protein, ratLipocalin-2LipocalinsMalondialdehydeMannitolPhosphodiesterase 5 InhibitorsProtective AgentsProto-Oncogene ProteinsPyrimidinesSulfonamidesudenafilComet assayIschemia reperfusion injuryMannitolNgal proteinUdenafil

Identifiers

PMID28681040
PMCPMC5494354

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.