Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28681013›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical mycology2016

Identification of

F Mohammadi, M R Javaheri, S Nekoeian, P Dehghan

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical mycology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 75 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Distribution ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  5. A Cross-Sectional Study to DetermineBioMed research international · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Adhesion ofThe Saudi dental journal · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Clinic-mycological spectrum ofCurrent medical mycology · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

F MohammadiDepartment of Medical Parasitology and Mycology, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
M R JavaheriDepartment of Medical Mycology and Parasitology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
S NekoeianDepartment of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Isfahan Province Health Center, Isfahan, Iran.
P DehghanDepartment of Medical Mycology and Parasitology, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
Tehran University of Medical Sciences · IRIsfahan Fertility and Infertility Center · IRIsfahan University of Medical Sciences · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeDiabetic patients are more susceptible to oral candidiasis infection than non-diabetics due to the factors promoting oral carriage of MATERIALS AND

methodsSwabs were taken from the mouth of 106 participants and were cultured on Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) medium. Likewise, the saliva samples were collected for salivary glucose and pH measurements. The study was performed during June 2014-September 2015 on two groups of diabetic patients (n=58) and non-diabetics (n=48) as the control group. The

resultsThe frequency of

conclusionXerostomia and disturbance of physiological factors including pH and glucose can promote overgrowth of

Indexed as

CHROMagar CandidaDiabetes mellitusOral candidiasisPCR-RFLP

Identifiers

PMID28681013
PMCPMC5490298
OpenAlexW2535359655

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.