ArticleCurrent medical mycology2015
Evaluation of the antifungal activities of various extracts from
Article in Current medical mycology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibacterial, Antifungal, Antibiofilm, and Cytotoxicity Activity of Astragalus Baba-Alliar Extract Against Main Causes of Dental Root Canal Infections.Archives of Razi Institute · 2025Article
- Metabolomic Profile of Volatile Organic Compounds from Leaves of Cashew Clones by HS-SPME/GC-MS for the Identification of Candidates for Anthracnose Resistance Markers.Journal of chemical ecology · 2023Article
- The Difference of Volatile Compounds in Female and Male Buds ofMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Antifungal and antibacterial activities of polyherbal toothpaste against oral pathogens, inCurrent medical mycology · 2018Article
- Evaluation of esterase and hemolysin activities of differentCurrent medical mycology · 2017Article
- Article
- Antifungal effects of the aqueous and ethanolic leaf extracts ofCurrent medical mycology · 2016Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeDespite the availability of various treatments for fungal diseases, there are some limitations in the management of these conditions due to multiple treatment-related side-effects. The present study was designed to investigate the antifungal properties of different extracts from MATERIALS AND
methodsDifferent parts of
resultsBased on GC/MS analysis, the main constituents of
conclusionBased on the findings of the present study, novel antifungal agents need to be developed, and use of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.