Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680873›Full record

ReviewClinical and translational imaging2017

Amino acid PET and MR perfusion imaging in brain tumours.

Christian P Filss, Francesco Cicone, Nadim Jon Shah, Norbert Galldiks, Karl-Josef Langen

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical and translational imaging, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Optimization and comparison of [American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  5. Assessment of Brain Tumour Perfusion Using Early-PhaseMolecular imaging and biology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Journal of neurology · 2021
    Observational
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Applications of radiomics and machine learning for radiotherapy of malignant brain tumors.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. PET imaging of medulloblastoma with anScientific reports · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Christian P FilssInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Francesco CiconeUnit of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Surgical and Medical Sciences and Translational Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Nadim Jon ShahInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Norbert GalldiksInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.
Karl-Josef LangenInstitute of Neuroscience and Medicine (INM-3, INM-4), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1101-5075
Forschungszentrum Jülich · DEUniversity Hospital of Lausanne · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the excellent capacity of the conventional MRI to image brain tumours, problems remain in answering a number of critical diagnostic questions. To overcome these diagnostic shortcomings, PET using radiolabeled amino acids and perfusion-weighted imaging (PWI) are currently under clinical evaluation. The role of amino acid PET and PWI in different diagnostic challenges in brain tumours is controversial.

methodsBased on the literature and experience of our centres in correlative imaging with PWI and PET using

resultsPWI is more readily available, but requires substantial expertise and is more sensitive to artifacts than amino acid PET. At initial diagnosis, PWI and amino acid PET can help to define a site for biopsy but amino acid PET appears to be more powerful to define the tumor extent. Both methods are helpful to differentiate progression or recurrence from unspecific posttherapeutic changes. Assessment of therapeutic efficacy can be achieved especially with amino acid PET, while the data with PWI are sparse.

conclusionBoth PWI and amino acid PET add valuable diagnostic information to the conventional MRI in the assessment of patients with brain tumours, but further studies are necessary to explore the complementary nature of these two methods.

Indexed as

18F-FDOPA18F-FETAmino acid PETBrain tumoursPerfusion-weighted MRIRelative cerebral blood volume (rCBV)

Identifiers

PMID28680873
PMCPMC5487907
OpenAlexW2592239897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.