Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680703›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2017

Patient pain during intravitreal injections under topical anesthesia: a systematic review.

Helio Francisco Shiroma, Augusto Key Karazawa Takaschima, Michel Eid Farah, Ana Luisa Höfling-Lima, Graziela de Luca Canto, Roberto Henrique Benedetti, Eduardo Buchele Rodrigues

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03871062 (A Prospective, Randomised, Single-masked Comparison of Topical Anesthesia and Topical Combined Subconjunctival), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03871062 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Randomised, Single-masked Comparison of Topical Anesthesia and Topical Combined Subconjunctival (Two-step) Anesthesia in Intravitreal Injection

TypeinterventionalSponsorAier School of Ophthalmology, Central South UniversityRan2019 to 2020Enrolled60ConditionsAnesthesia, LocalArmsTwo step anesthesia, topical anesthesia
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Preventive factors, diagnosis, and management of injection-related endophthalmitis: a literature review.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2022
    Review
  9. Novel Combined Lidocaine/Povidone Iodine Delivery System for Preintravitreal Injection.Journal of ocular pharmacology and therapeutics : the official journal of the Association for Ocular Pharmacology and Therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Anesthesia for Intravitreal Injection: A Systematic Review.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. 880 kHz ultrasound treatment for drug delivery to the vitreous humor.American journal of translational research · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Helio Francisco ShiromaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pastor William Richard Schisler 900/apto 1011, Florianópolis, SC 88034-100 Brazil.
Augusto Key Karazawa TakaschimaFlorianopolis Hospital, Florianópolis, Brazil.
Michel Eid FarahDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pastor William Richard Schisler 900/apto 1011, Florianópolis, SC 88034-100 Brazil.
Ana Luisa Höfling-LimaDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pastor William Richard Schisler 900/apto 1011, Florianópolis, SC 88034-100 Brazil.
Graziela de Luca CantoBrazilian Centre for Evidence-based Research, Health Sciences Centre, Federal University of Santa Catarina, Florianopolis, Brazil.
Roberto Henrique BenedettiUnisul-Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina, Tubarão, Brazil.
Eduardo Buchele RodriguesDepartment of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Federal University of São Paulo, Rua Pastor William Richard Schisler 900/apto 1011, Florianópolis, SC 88034-100 Brazil.
Universidade Federal de São Paulo · BRFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa e Inovação do Estado de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade do Sul de Santa Catarina · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntravitreal injection (IVI) is a very common vitreoretinal procedure, and multiple injections are often required per patient. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of various local anesthetic techniques in reducing pain during injection.

methodsA systematic review was conducted based on searches of Cochrane, LILACS, PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and the gray literature (Google Scholar). The end search date was February 19, 2016, across all databases. We classified pain by converting visual analog scale (VAS) scores (0-100 mm) into Jensen's classification levels: 0-4, no pain; 5-44, mild pain; 45-74, moderate pain; and 75-100, severe pain. An intervention was considered clinically significant when pain score change was >12 mm on a 100-mm scale.

resultsEight studies out of 23 met the eligibility criteria. The total number of patients was 847. Most studies (5/8 [62.5%]) were at unclear risk of bias because of unclear randomization, thus providing only moderate evidence to this review. The anesthetic techniques included eye drops with proparacaine, tetracaine or cocaine, a lidocaine pledget or gel, and subconjunctival injection of 2% lidocaine or 0.75% levobupivacaine. No study comprised all of the techniques. Pain was mild (VAS scores, 5-44 mm) regardless of anesthetic technique. A clinically significant intervention (pain score change >12 mm) was found for only one study comparing proparacaine drops, lidocaine gel, and subconjunctival lidocaine; in that study, a subconjunctival injection of 2% lidocaine provided the greatest pain reduction. A meta-analysis was not possible due to study heterogeneity.

conclusionsPatient pain during IVI under topical anesthesia is mild regardless of anesthetic technique. A subconjunctival injection of 2% lidocaine could be an option for highly sensitive patients. However, with moderate level of evidence, no single anesthetic technique could be defined as the best option for IVI.

Identifiers

PMID28680703
PMCPMC5494853
OpenAlexW2610228271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.