ReviewHealth psychology open
In-hospital experiences of families of potential organ donors: A systematic review and qualitative synthesis.
Review in Health psychology open. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- The bereavement experiences of families of potential organ donors: a qualitative longitudinal case study illuminating opportunities for family care.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2023Article
- Using systems perspectives in evidence synthesis: A methodological mapping review.Research synthesis methods · 2022Review
- Grief, Stress, Trauma, and Support During the Organ Donation Process.Transplantation direct · 2020Article
- [New transplantation law: how does one provide relatives with appropriate support?]Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin · 2019Article
- Survey Regarding Attitude of Family About Organ Donation After Brain Death in Korea.Annals of transplantation · 2017Article
- A novel approach to studying co-evolution of understanding and research: Family bereavement and the potential for organ donation as a case study.Health psychology openReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Information and compassion assist families of potential organ donors to make informed decisions. However, psychological implications of the in-hospital process are not well described with past research focusing on decision-making. To enhance understanding and improve service delivery, a systematic review was conducted. Inductive analysis and synthesis utilised Grounded Theory Methodology within a systems theory framework and contributed to a model proposing that family and staff form a System of Systems with shared responsibility for process outcomes. This model can guide evaluation and improvement of care and will be tested by means of a longitudinal study of family experiences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.