Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680576›Full record

ArticlePulmonary circulation2017

Recommendations for the use of oral treprostinil in clinical practice: a Delphi consensus project pulmonary circulation.

Franck F Rahaghi, Jeremy P Feldman, Roblee P Allen, Victor Tapson, Zeenat Safdar, Vijay P Balasubramanian, Shelley Shapiro, Michael A Mathier, Jean M Elwing, Murali M Chakinala and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pulmonary circulation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Oral Prostacyclin Pathway Agents Used in PAH: A Targeted Literature Review.ClinicoEconomics and outcomes research : CEOR · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Management of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.Current cardiovascular risk reports · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Delphi consensus recommendations for a treatment algorithm in pulmonary sarcoidosis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Review
  12. Management of repository corticotrophin injection therapy for pulmonary sarcoidosis: a Delphi study.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2020
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Combination Therapy in Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Gleaning a Practical Approach from the Randomized Trials.The International journal of angiology : official publication of the International College of Angiology, Inc · 2019
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Franck F RahaghiPulmonary Hypertension Clinic, Advanced Lung Disease Clinic, Weston, FL, USA.
Jeremy P FeldmanArizona Pulmonary Specialists Ltd, AZ, USA.
Roblee P AllenU.C. Davis Health System, Sacramento, CA, USA.
Victor TapsonCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Zeenat SafdarHouston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA.
Vijay P BalasubramanianUCSF Fresno, Fresno, CA, USA.
Shelley ShapiroDavid Geffen UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Michael A MathierUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jean M ElwingUniversity of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Murali M ChakinalaWashington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
R James WhiteUniversity of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Oral treprostinil was recently labeled for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Similar to the period immediately after parenteral treprostinil was approved, there is a significant knowledge gap for practicing physicians who might prescribe oral treprostinil. Despite its oral route of delivery, use of the drug is challenging because of the requirement for careful titration and management of drug-related adverse effects. We aimed to create a consensus document combining available evidence with expert opinion to provide guidance for use of oral treprostinil. Following a methodology commonly used in business and social sciences (the 'Delphi Process'), two investigators from the oral treprostinil (Freedom) studies created a series of statements based on available evidence and the package insert. The set of 'best practice' statements was circulated to nine other Freedom trial investigators. Their comments were incorporated into the document as new line items for further vote and comment. The subsequent document was put to vote line by line (scale of -5 to +5) and a final statement was drafted. Consensus recommendations include initial therapy with 0.125 mg for treatment naÿ patients, three times daily dosing, aggressive use of antidiarrheal medication, and a strong preference for use of the drug in combination with other approved PAH therapies. This process was particularly valuable in providing guidance for the management of adverse events (where essentially no data is available). The Delphi process was useful to codify investigator experience and subsequently develop investigator consensus about practical issues for physicians who may wish to prescribe oral treprostinil.

Indexed as

drug side effectsoral treprostinilpulmonary arterial hypertensionpulmonary delphi studies

Identifiers

PMID28680576
PMCPMC5448528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.