ReviewObstetric medicine2017
Congenital heart disease and pregnancy: A contemporary approach to counselling, pre-pregnancy investigations and the impact of pregnancy on heart function.
Review in Obstetric medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multifaceted Fontan Patients and Their Response to Pregnancy.JACC. Case reports · 2023Article
- Contemporary pregnancy outcomes for women with moderate and severe congenital heart disease.Obstetric medicine · 2023Article
- Priorities and Understanding of Pregnancy Among Women With Congenital Heart Disease: A Mixed-Methods Study.JACC. Advances · 2022Article
- Cardiac and Pregnancy Outcomes of Pregnant Patients With Congenital Heart Disease According to Risk Classification System.The American journal of cardiology · 2021Article
- Outcome of pregnancy in a contemporary cohort of adults with congenital heart disease-a 10-year, single-center experience.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2021Article
- Characteristics shifting of heart disease in pregnancy: A report from low middle-income country.Journal of public health research · 2021Article
- Receipt of American Heart Association-Recommended Preconception Health Care Among Privately Insured Women With Congenital Heart Defects, 2007-2013.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac disease in pregnancy is a challenging clinical problem. The number of women pursuing pregnancy and the underlying complexity of their cardiac disease is increasing, such that heart disease is now the leading cause of maternal mortality in developed countries. Women with congenital heart disease make up the majority of these cases and although maternal mortality is infrequent, a good outcome is only achieved though meticulous multidisciplinary care, beginning with pre-pregnancy counselling. All women with congenital heart disease should be assessed and be referred for pre-conception counselling prior to pregnancy and should receive thorough clinical assessment prior to pregnancy. In some conditions, such as pulmonary hypertension or severe/progressive aortic dilatation, pregnancy is of very high risk and women should be made aware of such risks. In such circumstances, if women choose to proceed with pregnancy, it is paramount that they are cared for by multidisciplinary teams who have experience and expertise of managing such conditions to minimise risks and optimise outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.