Evidence map›Paper›PMID 28680442›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2017

Perspectives and Challenges in Microbial Communities Metabolic Modeling.

Emanuele Bosi, Giovanni Bacci, Alessio Mengoni, Marco Fondi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Modeling approaches for probing cross-feeding interactions in the human gut microbiome.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Metabolic modelling approaches for describing and engineering microbial communities.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Experimental and computational approaches to unravel microbial community assembly.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emanuele BosiDepartment of Biology, University of FlorenceFlorence, Italy.
Giovanni BacciDepartment of Biology, University of FlorenceFlorence, Italy.
Alessio MengoniDepartment of Biology, University of FlorenceFlorence, Italy.
Marco FondiDepartment of Biology, University of FlorenceFlorence, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteria have evolved to efficiently interact each other, forming complex entities known as microbial communities. These "super-organisms" play a central role in maintaining the health of their eukaryotic hosts and in the cycling of elements like carbon and nitrogen. However, despite their crucial importance, the mechanisms that influence the functioning of microbial communities and their relationship with environmental perturbations are obscure. The study of microbial communities was boosted by tremendous advances in sequencing technologies, and in particular by the possibility to determine genomic sequences of bacteria directly from environmental samples. Indeed, with the advent of metagenomics, it has become possible to investigate, on a previously unparalleled scale, the taxonomical composition and the functional genetic elements present in a specific community. Notwithstanding, the metagenomic approach

Indexed as

constraint-based modelingmcFBAmetabolic interactionsmetabolic modelingmicrobial communitiesmicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID28680442
PMCPMC5478693

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.